On 04/22/2016 09:04 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
I saw some integration tests failures recently,
and I think there is a race condition between the
enumeration refresh timeout and the sleeps
after some operations that wait for this timeout.
SSSD fails
On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>I saw some integration tests failures recently,
>and I think there is a race condition between the
>enumeration refresh timeout and the sleeps
>after some operations that wait for this timeout.
>SSSD fails to populate changes from LDAP in time
>and
On 04/18/2016 12:39 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
On 04/18/2016 12:22 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (18/04/16 11:14), Michal Židek wrote:
On 04/18/2016 10:39 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
I saw some integration tests failures recently,
and I think there
On 04/18/2016 12:22 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (18/04/16 11:14), Michal Židek wrote:
On 04/18/2016 10:39 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
I saw some integration tests failures recently,
and I think there is a race condition between the
enumeration
On (18/04/16 11:14), Michal Židek wrote:
>On 04/18/2016 10:39 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
>>>Hi!
>>>
>>>I saw some integration tests failures recently,
>>>and I think there is a race condition between the
>>>enumeration refresh timeout and the sleeps
On 04/18/2016 10:39 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
I saw some integration tests failures recently,
and I think there is a race condition between the
enumeration refresh timeout and the sleeps
after some operations that wait for this timeout.
SSSD fails
On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>I saw some integration tests failures recently,
>and I think there is a race condition between the
>enumeration refresh timeout and the sleeps
>after some operations that wait for this timeout.
>SSSD fails to populate changes from LDAP in time
>and
On (04/12/15 16:58), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (04/12/15 16:02), Michal Židek wrote:
>>On 12/04/2015 03:07 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>On (04/12/15 14:35), Michal Židek wrote:
On 12/04/2015 02:32 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:29:49PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
On (03/12/15 20:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 05:59:07PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
>> >Hi!
>> >
>> >I saw some integration tests failures recently,
>> >and I think there is a race condition between the
>> >enumeration refresh
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:42:00AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (03/12/15 20:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 05:59:07PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
> >> >Hi!
> >> >
> >> >I saw some integration tests failures recently,
> >>
On (04/12/15 12:11), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:42:00AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (03/12/15 20:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 05:59:07PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
>> >> >Hi!
>> >> >
>> >> >I saw
On 12/04/2015 03:07 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (04/12/15 14:35), Michal Židek wrote:
On 12/04/2015 02:32 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:29:49PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
On 12/04/2015 12:29 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (04/12/15 12:11), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri,
On (04/12/15 16:02), Michal Židek wrote:
>On 12/04/2015 03:07 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (04/12/15 14:35), Michal Židek wrote:
>>>On 12/04/2015 02:32 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:29:49PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
>On 12/04/2015 12:29 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On 12/04/2015 12:29 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (04/12/15 12:11), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:42:00AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (03/12/15 20:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 05:59:07PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek
On 12/04/2015 12:42 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (03/12/15 20:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 05:59:07PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
I saw some integration tests failures recently,
and I think there is a race condition between
On 12/04/2015 02:32 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:29:49PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
On 12/04/2015 12:29 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (04/12/15 12:11), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:42:00AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (03/12/15 20:22), Jakub Hrozek
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:29:49PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 12/04/2015 12:29 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (04/12/15 12:11), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:42:00AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>On (03/12/15 20:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 05:59:07PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >I saw some integration tests failures recently,
> >and I think there is a race condition between the
> >enumeration refresh timeout and the sleeps
> >after some operations that
On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>I saw some integration tests failures recently,
>and I think there is a race condition between the
>enumeration refresh timeout and the sleeps
>after some operations that wait for this timeout.
>SSSD fails to populate changes from LDAP in time
>and
19 matches
Mail list logo