On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:21:15PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 06/09/2010 11:09 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
NACK, with this patch the backend returns with pd-pam_status not set.
Please change it to something like:
pd-pam_status = PAM_SYSTEM_ERR;
ipa_auth_reply(be_req,
On 06/10/2010 05:48 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
ok
ACK to this and to 0002-0008, too.
Pushed all eight to master and sssd-1-2.
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:53:55AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
All patches apply to both master and sssd-1-2.
...
From b21eecc180bb62f2783c50ebae30a20940636c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:44:47 -0400
Subject: [PATCH
On 06/09/2010 11:09 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
NACK, with this patch the backend returns with pd-pam_status not set.
Please change it to something like:
pd-pam_status = PAM_SYSTEM_ERR;
ipa_auth_reply(be_req, DP_ERR_FATAL, pd-pam_status);
and call
pd =
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:21:15PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 06/09/2010 11:09 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
NACK, with this patch the backend returns with pd-pam_status not set.
Please change it to something like:
pd-pam_status = PAM_SYSTEM_ERR;
ipa_auth_reply(be_req,
