On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:10:25AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 09:05 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
I changed the subject because this is a separate discussion and not a
review of the patches.
It is generally a good idea to be able to get SUDO rules from two
different
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 13:13 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:10:25AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 09:05 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
I changed the subject because this is a separate discussion and not a
review of the patches.
It is generally a
On 11/13/2012 09:24 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 13:13 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:10:25AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 09:05 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
I changed the subject because this is a separate discussion and not a
review of
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 18:43 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
This is not always necessarily a problem. In some situations the 2
domains may exist for reasons that do not have much to do with level
of
trusts, meaning the 2 domains are within the same trust boundaries,
however if the 2 domains are
On 11/12/2012 10:10 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 09:05 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
I changed the subject because this is a separate discussion and not a
review of the patches.
It is generally a good idea to be able to get SUDO rules from two
different domains.
Think about a
