[SSSD] [sssd PR#525][comment] TESTS: simple CA to generate certificates for test

2018-03-13 Thread sumit-bose
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/525 Title: #525: TESTS: simple CA to generate certificates for test sumit-bose commented: """ @jhrozek, I can do the backport. I'd just like to check some oddity on Debian @fidencio found before. """ See the full comment at

[SSSD] [sssd PR#525][comment] TESTS: simple CA to generate certificates for test

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/525 Title: #525: TESTS: simple CA to generate certificates for test jhrozek commented: """ > On 13 Mar 2018, at 08:04, sumit-bose wrote: > > @jhrozek, I can do the backport. I'd just like to check some oddity on Debian >

[SSSD] [sssd PR#532][comment] TESTS: Fix E501 pep8 issues on test_netgroup.py

2018-03-13 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/532 Title: #532: TESTS: Fix E501 pep8 issues on test_netgroup.py mzidek-rh commented: """ ACK. CI results: $SSSD_LAB.com/:8080/job/ci/8697/ """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/532#issuecomment-372600743

[SSSD] [sssd PR#532][+Accepted] TESTS: Fix E501 pep8 issues on test_netgroup.py

2018-03-13 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/532 Title: #532: TESTS: Fix E501 pep8 issues on test_netgroup.py Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[SSSD] [sssd PR#519][+Pushed] DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519 Title: #519: DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists Label: +Pushed ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[SSSD] [sssd PR#519][comment] DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519 Title: #519: DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists jhrozek commented: """ I fixed a trivial const warning in the code and pushed the patch to master: e32e17d04c796b37bc3f4cde58106d54ffa2b6d1 """ See the full comment at

[SSSD] [sssd PR#519][closed] DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519 Author: justin-stephenson Title: #519: DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/519/head:pr519 git checkout pr519

[SSSD] KCM talking to secrets over REST API (or not)

2018-03-13 Thread Jakub Hrozek
Hi, last week, me, some other SSSD developers and Robbie looked at how the KCM server in its current state can be debugged and what the current issues are. One thing that stood out was that because every Kerberos operation now requires a round-trip between libkrb5 to sssd-kcm and then to

[SSSD] [sssd PR#532][closed] TESTS: Fix E501 pep8 issues on test_netgroup.py

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/532 Author: fidencio Title: #532: TESTS: Fix E501 pep8 issues on test_netgroup.py Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/532/head:pr532 git checkout pr532

[SSSD] [sssd PR#532][comment] TESTS: Fix E501 pep8 issues on test_netgroup.py

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/532 Title: #532: TESTS: Fix E501 pep8 issues on test_netgroup.py jhrozek commented: """ * master: cce64caa78d088d54c40e50b777b8a8ddd1a0c0a """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/532#issuecomment-372605859

[SSSD] [sssd PR#531][comment] Add the needed machinery to have automated builds for our COPR repos

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/531 Title: #531: Add the needed machinery to have automated builds for our COPR repos jhrozek commented: """ The COPR repos should be at least usable and currently the git HEAD of our branches might or might not be usable in some aspects -- for example

[SSSD] [sssd PR#528][synchronized] NSS: Adjust netgroup setnetgrent cache lifetime if midpoint refresh is used

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/528 Author: jhrozek Title: #528: NSS: Adjust netgroup setnetgrent cache lifetime if midpoint refresh is used Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/528/head:pr528 git

[SSSD] [sssd PR#515][comment] sssctl: Showing help even when sssd not configured

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/515 Title: #515: sssctl: Showing help even when sssd not configured jhrozek commented: """ @pbrezina can you also approve the patches to make sure I don't ack something that you wouldn't like architecturally? """ See the full comment at

[SSSD] [sssd PR#515][comment] sssctl: Showing help even when sssd not configured

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/515 Title: #515: sssctl: Showing help even when sssd not configured jhrozek commented: """ retest this please """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/515#issuecomment-372606305 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#515][comment] sssctl: Showing help even when sssd not configured

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/515 Title: #515: sssctl: Showing help even when sssd not configured jhrozek commented: """ I think the tests failed because of the issue fixed in pr #532, so I'm going to reschedule them.. """ See the full comment at

[SSSD] [sssd PR#532][+Pushed] TESTS: Fix E501 pep8 issues on test_netgroup.py

2018-03-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/532 Title: #532: TESTS: Fix E501 pep8 issues on test_netgroup.py Label: +Pushed ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[SSSD] Re: KCM talking to secrets over REST API (or not)

2018-03-13 Thread Jakub Hrozek
> On 13 Mar 2018, at 13:42, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 12:05 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> last week, me, some other SSSD developers and Robbie looked at how the KCM >> server in its current state can be debugged and what the current issues are.

[SSSD] Re: KCM talking to secrets over REST API (or not)

2018-03-13 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 12:05 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > Hi, > > last week, me, some other SSSD developers and Robbie looked at how the KCM > server in its current state can be debugged and what the current issues are. > One thing that stood out was that because every Kerberos operation now >

[SSSD] [sssd PR#531][comment] Add the needed machinery to have automated builds for our COPR repos

2018-03-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/531 Title: #531: Add the needed machinery to have automated builds for our COPR repos fidencio commented: """ > The COPR repos should be at least usable and currently the git HEAD of our > branches might or might not be usable in some aspects -- for