On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 09:02:34PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 10:11 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 05:46:24PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 17:10 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
Most of items are not mandatory at the protocol level. If e.g.
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 23:36 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Patch 1:
- mostly good but mem hierarchy between ops_ctx and tools_ctx needs
to
be reversed
^^^ this is still not addressed, once you do 0001 can be acked.
- also some cases where codyng style is not followed (missing space
With this patch all the backend providers can share the same offline
status. This means composite backends like what AD or IPA will be that
use a mix of ldap and krb can share the offline status for both
protocols.
A further extension might allow to have per protocol online/offline
status, that
