On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 22:45 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this patch adds a timeout handling for the kerberos children. If a
> child
> needs omre then krb5auth_timeout seconds to send a response it is
> killed
> and the baclend is marked offline.
Works for me, ackd and pushed.
Btw I open
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 22:51 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>
> Should I redo this? The patches will most probably be applied
> together,
> but maybe it's better if every patch is self-contained..
If it will not take you too much time it would be nice to have them
straightened :)
If you think it will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/14/2009 08:53 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> this is the code I see for the function
> init_sss_tools()
>
> +octx = talloc_zero(tctx, struct ops_ctx);
> +if (octx == NULL) {
> +DEBUG(1, ("Could not allocate memory for data context\n"));
Hi,
this patch adds a timeout handling for the kerberos children. If a child
needs omre then krb5auth_timeout seconds to send a response it is killed
and the baclend is marked offline.
bye,
Sumit
>From 4104863d945c66e947f47af6cde9141646bf51ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Mon,
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 21:26 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hadn't checked a last minute change properly with the result that
> the
> detection if mkstemp should be used or not is broken. This patch
> should
> fix this.
tested, acked, pushed
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:03 -0700, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
>
> Ok so I'll wait until 0.6 or play with HEAD. Is there anything you
> could use help testing out?
Any testing will be mostly welcome.
Btw, if you have questions or find issues and want a faster response you
can also join #freeipa on Fre
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/14/2009 03:56 PM, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
>> What is the suggested version of sssd to use as a glorified nscd
>> replacement for an openldap setup? I happened to notice that Ubuntu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/14/2009 03:56 PM, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> What is the suggested version of sssd to use as a glorified nscd
> replacement for an openldap setup? I happened to notice that Ubuntu is
> using 0.5, but has cherry picked a few fixes. Will there be 0.5.
What is the suggested version of sssd to use as a glorified nscd
replacement for an openldap setup? I happened to notice that Ubuntu is
using 0.5, but has cherry picked a few fixes. Will there be 0.5.x
point releases or should I wait for 0.6? Are there any config gotchas?
This will be on a Fedora c
Hi,
I hadn't checked a last minute change properly with the result that the
detection if mkstemp should be used or not is broken. This patch should
fix this.
bye,
Sumit
>From f40ae51b976c2022c07319235f2c1b31ead89636 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:12:20 +0200
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 19:57 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thank you for the review, new patches attached.
>
> On 09/13/2009 04:20 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 23:36 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>> Patch 1:
> >>> - mostly good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2009 10:56 PM, John Dennis wrote:
> I've reviewed the python binding for sss. It looks pretty good Jakub. I
> only have a few comments and most of these are style issues as opposed
> to a coding or logic flaw.
>
Thank you for the review, the
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:32 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this patch add two new option to make the Kerberos provider of sssd
> more
> compatible with pam_krb5.
rebased to apply over the other patches (there was only some fuzz, had
to change no code), acked and pushed.
There are some war
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 11:36 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 10:09 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is the new version of the cli_pid patch with the missing size
> > added. There are two related patches.
> >
> > 0002 removes the unused client locale. It was added at a
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 18:10 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> I agree, this patch is a good starting point and we can add fine
> tuning
> later.
>
> ACK.
pushed
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.f
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 18:21 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:32:40AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 14:34 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nack. Generates a segfault running "getent passwd u...@ldap"
> > > >
> > >
> > > I cannot reproduce this wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/14/2009 12:10 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:30:44AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 07:48 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> Just a nitpick, but why did you replace sbus_conn_send_reply() in
>>> be_check_on
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:30:44AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 07:48 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Just a nitpick, but why did you replace sbus_conn_send_reply() in
> > be_check_online with sbus_get_connection and dbus_connection_send()?
> > They are functionally identica
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 10:09 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the new version of the cli_pid patch with the missing size
> added. There are two related patches.
>
> 0002 removes the unused client locale. It was added at a time where we
> talked about generating all messages the client sh
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 14:34 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >
> > Nack. Generates a segfault running "getent passwd u...@ldap"
> >
>
> I cannot reproduce this with my setup, but
>
> providers/ldap/ldap_id.c:982: warning: 'ldap_id_cleanup_done' defined
> but not used
>
> and there are some typos in
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 07:48 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Just a nitpick, but why did you replace sbus_conn_send_reply() in
> be_check_online with sbus_get_connection and dbus_connection_send()?
> They are functionally identical. (except that sbus_conn_send_reply()
> can
> get the connection in
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:32:40AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 14:34 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > >
> > > Nack. Generates a segfault running "getent passwd u...@ldap"
> > >
> >
> > I cannot reproduce this with my setup, but
> >
> > providers/ldap/ldap_id.c:982: warning: 'ld
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 08:03 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Nack. Generates a segfault running "getent passwd u...@ldap"
Don't see how this patch can cause that,
do you have a stack trace ?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
___
sssd-
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 08:03:14AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/13/2009 10:38 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > This patch finally allows us to define the type for basic options.
> > It uses a union to store different types, and an enum to lis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/13/2009 10:38 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> This patch finally allows us to define the type for basic options.
> It uses a union to store different types, and an enum to list the
> allowed types.
> It also provides for helper functions that always chec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/13/2009 10:31 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> With this patch all the backend providers can share the same offline
> status. This means composite backends like what AD or IPA will be that
> use a mix of ldap and krb can share the offline status for both
Hi,
this patch add two new option to make the Kerberos provider of sssd more
compatible with pam_krb5.
bye,
Sumit
>From 021ee9186ac3a6f9939f1ae0bc748aae112de660 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:43:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] add krb5ccache_dir and krb5ccname_temp
Hi,
this is the new version of the cli_pid patch with the missing size
added. There are two related patches.
0002 removes the unused client locale. It was added at a time where we
talked about generating all messages the client should display on the
server side.
Based on the previous discussion
28 matches
Mail list logo
