On (23/07/15 10:57), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:39:00AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/07/15 21:33), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch fixes regression tracked by
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2723
Please see the commit message for more details.
Hi,
see the attached patch for ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1697
I think this is a candidate to include in our
coding guidelines.
Thanks,
Michal
--
Senior Principal Intern
From e731298ddb68395322843e3b143ff04bdec3353f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:47:19PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
I hope attached patch set addresses all concerns, thanks!
My issues were addressed and the code seems to work. Coverity didn't
find anything either.
ACK
___
sssd-devel mailing list
Hi,
This patch fixes an issue with two factor authentication. When the user
is prompted to enter long term password (first factor) and one-time
component (second factor) separately the first component may remain on
the PAM stack so that other modules can use the long term password.
bye,
Sumit
I hope attached patch set addresses all concerns, thanks!
From 228335d2a51b5624f8500e69418e0df1355dc64c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Reichl prei...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:01:24 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] DYNDNS: sss_iface_addr_list_get return ENOENT
If none of eligible
On (21/07/15 21:33), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch fixes regression tracked by
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2723
Please see the commit message for more details.
From 2f4e2e6d5e8f29f5b2cdd9f0b825edc172da57ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 07:54:43PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello Jakub,
thanks for the comments, I have updated first 4th patches as you proposed,
but I need some clarification of the last patch, please see comments inline:
The first patches are mostly good now, I only have two minor
On (20/07/15 10:41), Stephen Gallagher wrote:
It is possible to have a machine where none of the GPOs associated with
it include access-control rules. Currently, this results in a
denial-by-system-error.
We need to treat this case as allowing the user (see the test cases in
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:39:00AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/07/15 21:33), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch fixes regression tracked by
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2723
Please see the commit message for more details.
From
написане Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:56:15 +0300, Yuri Chornoivan
yurc...@ukr.net:
Hi,
There are several minor typos in SSSD code. Thanks for fixing them.
Best regards,
Yuri
Ping?
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:03:33PM +0300, Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
написане Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:56:15 +0300, Yuri Chornoivan yurc...@ukr.net:
Hi,
There are several minor typos in SSSD code. Thanks for fixing them.
Best regards,
Yuri
Ping?
Sorry about the delay Yuri, I didn't tag the
On 07/23/2015 11:42 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
+static errno_t match_ip(const struct sockaddr *sa,
+const struct sockaddr *sb,
+bool *_res)
Don't you think it would be simpler to just return bool? For cases where
Yes, it would be simpler, but I
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:28:33PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 07/23/2015 11:42 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
+static errno_t match_ip(const struct sockaddr *sa,
+const struct sockaddr *sb,
+bool *_res)
Don't you think it would be simpler to just
ehlo,
It's a side effect of my effort to write integration tests for memory cache.
Attached patch simplify troubleshooting of sssd in cwrap environment.
LS
From 1d270fee496651b8560790a98d444d86fecbc8ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik lsleb...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:25:06PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 06:16:00PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch fixes #2718. To reproduce, run sssd as the root user,
but chown the keytab as the sssd users.
And now with two additional trivial patches
15 matches
Mail list logo