On (12/08/15 14:35), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/12/2015 06:21 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/08/15 14:43), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/11/2015 01:41 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/08/15 13:32), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/10/2015 12:26 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/08/15 10:41), Lukas
On (12/08/15 14:07), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/11/2015 02:43 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
I do not think that the fact that some situation is unlikely
to happen is a reason to ignore it, especially if the
solution is as easy as this one. And I know we could simply
ask user in error message to run
On (12/08/15 17:57), Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I have explored in detail why the test responder_cache_req-tests failed so
often. I created a new VM with RHEL 6.7.
OBSERVATION:
How we know, CI machines are under pressure, so I wrote simple cpu_braker,
see [1]. I ran the tests 50 times with
On (12/08/15 19:09), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/12/2015 06:24 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/08/15 15:00), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/11/2015 01:25 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/08/15 13:16), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/11/2015 06:52 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/08/15 19:28), Michal Židek
On (12/08/15 14:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 06:38:29AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
Use after free can happed if there are two domains and user is not found
in the first one.
LS
Would it be possible to write a testcase in the NSS responder test?
It requires
On (12/08/15 09:42), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/12/2015 06:18 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/08/15 18:36), Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
I'm investigating log file with debug_level 9 that contains following lines
[sssd[be[dom]]] [sysdb_update_members_ex] (0x0020): Could not add member
On 08/12/2015 10:11 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/08/15 09:42), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/12/2015 06:18 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/08/15 18:36), Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
I'm investigating log file with debug_level 9 that contains following lines
[sssd[be[dom]]]
On 08/12/2015 06:18 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/08/15 18:36), Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
I'm investigating log file with debug_level 9 that contains following lines
[sssd[be[dom]]] [sysdb_update_members_ex] (0x0020): Could not add member
[user@dom] to group [somedn]. Skipping.
ehlo,
attached patch shoul avoid situation as in commit
7c69221077c780e62f6c536e78675f2dc1c131bc
The comments does not guarantee anything.
Author: Michal Zidek mzi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Mar 10 17:30:48 2015 +0100
DEBUG: Add missing strings for error messages
We had more error
On (12/08/15 10:28), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/12/2015 10:11 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/08/15 09:42), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/12/2015 06:18 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/08/15 18:36), Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
I'm investigating log file with debug_level 9 that contains following
Hi,
I have explored in detail why the test responder_cache_req-tests failed
so often. I created a new VM with RHEL 6.7.
OBSERVATION:
How we know, CI machines are under pressure, so I wrote simple
cpu_braker, see [1]. I ran the tests 50 times with cpu_braker (average
load 2.60, only 1
On 08/12/2015 06:24 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/08/15 15:00), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/11/2015 01:25 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/08/15 13:16), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/11/2015 06:52 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/08/15 19:28), Michal Židek wrote:
See attached patch that
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:59:24PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patches fix #2742. The first one makes sure we can print
the certificate (or any binary attribute, really) safely. We only need
to make sure to escape the attribute values before saving them to sysdb,
because
Hi,
there is a patchset that adds sss_unique_file with an optional
destructor:
https://patchwork.acksyn.org/patch/11351/
Attached are patches that use the function instead of mkstemp(). As you
can see in the patches, we already fix some bugs this way, especially
removing the tmpfiles left
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 06:38:29AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
Use after free can happed if there are two domains and user is not found
in the first one.
LS
Would it be possible to write a testcase in the NSS responder test?
___
On 08/11/2015 02:43 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
I do not think that the fact that some situation is unlikely
to happen is a reason to ignore it, especially if the
solution is as easy as this one. And I know we could simply
ask user in error message to run sss_cache again, but I do
not see reason
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 12:22:39PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 07/30/2015 09:52 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:46:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patches implement fetching the keytab for one-way trusts on
each sssd restart. This is in order for admin
On 08/12/2015 01:06 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/08/15 10:28), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/12/2015 10:11 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/08/15 09:42), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/12/2015 06:18 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/08/15 18:36), Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
I'm investigating
On 08/12/2015 06:21 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/08/15 14:43), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/11/2015 01:41 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/08/15 13:32), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/10/2015 12:26 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/08/15 10:41), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (07/08/15 21:19),
19 matches
Mail list logo
