Hi,
ssia...
I was working on implementing https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2637
and while for most occurences it was quite easy to set domain status
instead of back end status, I hit the sdap_id_op module..
The sdap_id_op operation sets the offline status directly, in a bit of
a hackish way
CI passed: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/24/24/summary.html
ACK to all patches.
- Original Message -
From: "Pavel Reichl"
To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 6:40:51 PM
Subject: Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] cleanup task: Expire all
On 09/01/2015 08:44 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/31/2015 09:51 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:33:52PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:19:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ACK
LS
* master: 11e8f3ecdddf8edd8b1bbe9f41b49ce8b709b92a
This patch broke
On (24/07/15 17:24), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (22/07/15 11:43), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 03:52:52PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> On (20/07/15 15:46), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> >ehlo,
>>> >
>>> >attached is a regression test for old ticket 2163.
>>> >Currently it fails
On 08/31/2015 09:51 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:33:52PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:19:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ACK
LS
* master: 11e8f3ecdddf8edd8b1bbe9f41b49ce8b709b92a
This patch broke distcheck:
../src/util/sss_cli_cmd.c
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 09:01:48PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 07:23:29AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > ehlo,
> >
> > please review attached patch for regression #2772
> >
> > LS
>
> Hi Lukas,
>
> thank you for taking care of the issue.
>
> The patch is working as
This change brings the upstream packaging closer to the downstream
(fedora) packaging. For more information, please see
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2770
From 1661c53bbc0df2efd3a767e25a5c7f33f4b0c717 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Robbie Harwood (frozencemetery)"
The sorted file processing is a useful guarantee to have, and is
provided by the current code. https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2771
From d11f7814c968cb94d8321e723460391df556e2d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robbie Harwood
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:14:12 -0400
Subject:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:21:23PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 08/18/2015 03:35 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >one more usage of sss_unique_file I forgot to send earlier.
>
> Nack.
>
> > ret = close(fd);
> >+fd = -1;
> > if (ret == -1) {
> > ret = errno;
> >
On 09/01/2015 11:19 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:21:23PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/18/2015 03:35 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
one more usage of sss_unique_file I forgot to send earlier.
Nack.
ret = close(fd);
+fd = -1;
if (ret == -1) {
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:15:16PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 07:41:02AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (12/08/15 14:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 06:38:29AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >> ehlo,
> > >>
> > >> Use after free can happed
ehlo,
attached is alternative version for ticket 2744.
The unit test passed but there is a performance improvement.
If we compare 3rd patch to current master than
there is a 10 less invocation of malloc (an also other functions) per group.
and we saved allocation of 1091 per group.
There was a
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:00:26AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>
> Shall we push this patch to master since it looks correct code wise and
> doesn't look like it should regress anything or shall we wait for more
> complete solution in 1.14 that would also address domain-vs-realm
> concerns?
Is
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:47:00AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (10/08/15 17:18), Michal Židek wrote:
> >On 08/06/2015 01:39 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>On (05/08/15 13:41), Michal Židek wrote:
> >>>On 07/30/2015 06:08 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>-} else if (version <
On 08/28/2015 02:09 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
please see simple patch attached.
Thanks!
Ack.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:00:15AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (01/09/15 10:51), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:47:00AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (10/08/15 17:18), Michal Židek wrote:
> >> >On 08/06/2015 01:39 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >>On (05/08/15
On 09/01/2015 11:11 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:00:15AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (01/09/15 10:51), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:47:00AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/08/15 17:18), Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/06/2015 01:39 PM, Lukas
On 09/01/2015 10:05 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:26:06PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/10/2015 03:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I found two issues in the sbus code while testing the by-certificate
lookups. One was that if parsing the reply with client UID failed,
On (01/09/15 10:51), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:47:00AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (10/08/15 17:18), Michal Židek wrote:
>> >On 08/06/2015 01:39 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >>On (05/08/15 13:41), Michal Židek wrote:
>> >>>On 07/30/2015 06:08 PM, Lukas Slebodnik
In https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/FAQ SSSDBG_FATAL_FAILURE is
described as:
0x0010: Fatal failures. Anything that would prevent SSSD
from
starting up or causes it to cease running.
Are you sure that such errors can happen in HBAC?
HBAC_DBG_FATAL isn't used in
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 12:35:51PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:50:06AM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:33:11AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > >
> > > Most probable because ad...@example.test is the Kerberos principal of
> > > your user. If SSSD
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 08:49:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (24/07/15 17:24), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (22/07/15 11:43), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 03:52:52PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>> On (20/07/15 15:46), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>> >ehlo,
> >>> >
>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:28:32AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >Please see the attached patch, does it look better to you?
>
> Hi, yes. There is just an indentation error:
>
> >+if (fd != -1) {
> >+fret = close(fd);
> >+if (fret == -1) {
> >+fret = errno;
> >+
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:57:36AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (01/09/15 11:55), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 08:49:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (24/07/15 17:24), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >On (22/07/15 11:43), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >>On Mon, Jul 20,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 10:51:25AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 02:09 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >please see simple patch attached.
> >
> >Thanks!
>
> Ack.
* master: bfa5e3869bb68213f08169efe55c45cb625e8fd0
___
sssd-devel
On 09/01/2015 10:58 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/31/2015 01:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:09:19PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (29/08/15 14:33), Alexander
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:37:29AM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 08:44 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
> >On 08/31/2015 09:51 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:33:52PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:19:18PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ACK
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:26:06PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 03:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I found two issues in the sbus code while testing the by-certificate
> >lookups. One was that if parsing the reply with client UID failed, then
> >errno would have been
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:06:59AM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:00:26AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >
> > Shall we push this patch to master since it looks correct code wise and
> > doesn't look like it should regress anything or shall we wait for more
> > complete
On (01/09/15 11:57), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (01/09/15 11:55), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 08:49:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> On (24/07/15 17:24), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> >On (22/07/15 11:43), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> >>On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 03:52:52PM +0200,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 08/31/2015 01:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:09:19PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >>On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>On (29/08/15 14:33), Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 10:37:16AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 10:05 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:26:06PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>On 08/10/2015 03:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I found two issues in the sbus code while testing the
On (01/09/15 11:55), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 08:49:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (24/07/15 17:24), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >On (22/07/15 11:43), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >>On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 03:52:52PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >>> On (20/07/15 15:46),
On 09/01/2015 11:54 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:28:32AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
Please see the attached patch, does it look better to you?
Hi, yes. There is just an indentation error:
+if (fd != -1) {
+fret = close(fd);
+if (fret == -1) {
+
On 09/01/2015 07:21 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (31/08/15 16:24), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
I wouldn't say these are exclusive. I think we still need to fix the Git tree
detection, so it doesn't consider to be under a git repo, which doesn't start
at the source root, and so it works with
Hi,
this patch contains a fix for https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2692.
If uses the SDAP_SASL_AUTHID config option because it already contains
the right NetBIOS name in the AD case.
I basically tested the patch on a host with a long hostname. Without the
patch I see:
[ad_gpo_connect_done]
On 08/31/2015 09:59 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
diff --git a/src/tests/whitespace_test b/src/tests/whitespace_test
new file mode 100755
index
..508fe2d532cc6a3967af8eaa5c7dc4dccdc653f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/tests/whitespace_test
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
On 08/31/2015 06:53 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
0001-Makefile.am-Add-AM_CFLAGS-for-libsss_ldap_common.patch
From b563b44a99c91c75523ea11e18cb7f7552750817 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Michal=20=C5=BDidek?=
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:21:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5]
ehlo,
Attached patches reduce count of compiled ".c" files
from 935 -> 815 (almost 9%). This reduction is achieved
in deduplication of compiling "*.c" files in tests.
BTW the tests were compiled 4 times in our CI script.
* make tests
* mock build
* make distcheck
* code coverage
The result
On (01/09/15 18:18), Robbie Harwood wrote:
>This change brings the upstream packaging closer to the downstream
>(fedora) packaging. For more information, please see
>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2770
>From 1661c53bbc0df2efd3a767e25a5c7f33f4b0c717 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: "Robbie
On (01/09/15 18:19), Robbie Harwood wrote:
>The sorted file processing is a useful guarantee to have, and is
>provided by the current code. https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2771
>From d11f7814c968cb94d8321e723460391df556e2d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Robbie Harwood
On 09/01/2015 05:53 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 09/01/2015 04:02 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
From 314116b09758e23626021da2f99f57f64846b26b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Michal=20=C5=BDidek?=
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:21:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Makefile.am: Add
On 09/01/2015 06:23 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
On 09/01/2015 05:53 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 09/01/2015 04:02 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
From 314116b09758e23626021da2f99f57f64846b26b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Michal=20=C5=BDidek?=
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015
On 09/01/2015 11:00 AM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
From 6b1c6cac7123e78a2c55c51019b66a6bcf97ec29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:56:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] HBAC: Better libhbac debugging
Added support for logging via external log function.
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 02:57:36PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> With this patch the only remaining caller for sss_krb5_get_primary() is
> in the same source file. Shall it be made static and removed from
> sss_krb5.h?
Yes, but in a different patch, please.
On 09/01/2015 02:37 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/31/2015 06:53 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
0001-Makefile.am-Add-AM_CFLAGS-for-libsss_ldap_common.patch
From b563b44a99c91c75523ea11e18cb7f7552750817 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Michal=20=C5=BDidek?=
Date: Mon, 31
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:14:59PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 02:57:36PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > With this patch the only remaining caller for sss_krb5_get_primary() is
> > in the same source file. Shall it be made static and removed from
> > sss_krb5.h?
>
> Yes,
On 09/01/2015 04:02 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
From 314116b09758e23626021da2f99f57f64846b26b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Michal=20=C5=BDidek?=
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:21:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Makefile.am: Add missing AM_CFLAGS
Some targets were missing
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:57:36AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (01/09/15 11:55), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 08:49:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >> On (24/07/15 17:24), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:57:14PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 11:54 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:28:32AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>>Please see the attached patch, does it look better to you?
> >>
> >>Hi, yes. There is just an indentation error:
> >>
50 matches
Mail list logo