[SSSD] Slow email responses this week from FreeIPA/SSSD teams at Red Hat

2015-09-08 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
Hi everyone! We have a gathering of Red Hat members of FreeIPA and SSSD teams in Brno, Czech Republic this week with a lot of design and discussion meetings. Naturally, we try to lock ourselves down in dungeons without wifi access and without laptops (not!) to avoid distractions and great

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] UTIL: Alternative way for debug message initialisation

2015-09-08 Thread Michal Židek
On 08/27/2015 12:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (19/08/15 15:57), Michal Židek wrote: On 08/12/2015 01:11 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: ehlo, attached patch shoul avoid situation as in commit 7c69221077c780e62f6c536e78675f2dc1c131bc The comments does not guarantee anything. Author: Michal

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] UTIL: Alternative way for debug message initialisation

2015-09-08 Thread Michal Židek
On 09/08/2015 03:09 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (08/09/15 14:57), Michal Židek wrote: On 08/27/2015 12:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (19/08/15 15:57), Michal Židek wrote: On 08/12/2015 01:11 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: ehlo, attached patch shoul avoid situation as in commit

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] UTIL: Alternative way for debug message initialisation

2015-09-08 Thread Petr Cech
On 09/08/2015 03:31 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: I would rather used option d) than option a). (Do not change anything) Option b) does not require namespacing, because it is a local macro. Option c) is the most readable, but there is a collision with gnu gettext. So it cannot be used. LS Only

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] UTIL: Alternative way for debug message initialisation

2015-09-08 Thread Michal Židek
On 09/08/2015 03:31 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (08/09/15 15:21), Michal Židek wrote: On 09/08/2015 03:09 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (08/09/15 14:57), Michal Židek wrote: On 08/27/2015 12:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (19/08/15 15:57), Michal Židek wrote: On 08/12/2015 01:11 PM,

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] UTIL: Alternative way for debug message initialisation

2015-09-08 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (08/09/15 14:57), Michal Židek wrote: >On 08/27/2015 12:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>On (19/08/15 15:57), Michal Židek wrote: >>>On 08/12/2015 01:11 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: ehlo, attached patch shoul avoid situation as in commit 7c69221077c780e62f6c536e78675f2dc1c131bc

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Temporarily mark subdomain as inactive instead marking the whole back end offline

2015-09-08 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:40:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:35:49PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > > From 591d07855b70aacbb4488ba9a54438ee9ded48b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Jakub Hrozek > > Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:27:17 +0200 > > Subject:

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] DATA_PROVIDER: BE_REQ as string in log message

2015-09-08 Thread Pavel Reichl
On 09/08/2015 04:28 PM, Petr Cech wrote: On 09/04/2015 04:32 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote: On 08/28/2015 04:31 PM, Petr Cech wrote: + "Got request for [%#x][%s][%d][%s]\n", type, be_req2str(type), + attr_type, filter); Petr do you think it could be useful to print attr_type as

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] UTIL: Alternative way for debug message initialisation

2015-09-08 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (08/09/15 15:21), Michal Židek wrote: >On 09/08/2015 03:09 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>On (08/09/15 14:57), Michal Židek wrote: >>>On 08/27/2015 12:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (19/08/15 15:57), Michal Židek wrote: >On 08/12/2015 01:11 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>ehlo, >>

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] DATA_PROVIDER: BE_REQ as string in log message

2015-09-08 Thread Petr Cech
On 09/04/2015 04:32 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote: On 08/28/2015 04:31 PM, Petr Cech wrote: + "Got request for [%#x][%s][%d][%s]\n", type, be_req2str(type), + attr_type, filter); Petr do you think it could be useful to print attr_type as a string? We talked about it offline. It

[SSSD] [PATCH] KRB5: Don't error out reading a minimal krb5.conf

2015-09-08 Thread Jakub Hrozek
Hi, I was seeing some loud debug messages with a direct AD client. I think it's safe to silence them by ignoring these krb5 error code (I saw a similar ignore blocks in libkrb5 itself), please see the attached patch. >From 0c083ceed5e56ab19e893c6c8a4a91d63f9e493a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From:

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] SDAP: Remove unused function

2015-09-08 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 03:12:06PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote: > > > On 09/02/2015 04:21 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote: > > > >On 09/02/2015 04:16 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >>Unused code is broken code, remove it :) > >> > >> > >> > >>___ > >>sssd-devel