[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] FO: Use tevent_req_defer_callback() when notifying callers

2016-03-03 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (07/12/15 16:15), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:24:19PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: >> On 11/23/2015 06:39 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:35:07PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >>--- a/src/tests/cmocka/test_fo_srv.c >> >>+++

[SSSD] Re: [PATCHES] util: Continue if setlocale fails

2016-03-03 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (04/11/15 09:13), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >On (04/11/15 09:06), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>On (03/11/15 14:48), Michal Židek wrote: >>>On 11/03/2015 12:25 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (30/10/15 16:06), Michal Židek wrote: >On 10/30/2015 09:37 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>>From

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Use refcount to keep track of server structures returned from failover

2016-03-03 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (23/10/15 10:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:50:07AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: >> On 10/11/2015 10:00 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >the attached patches are my proposal to fix >> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2829 >> > >> >I haven't tested them past

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Use refcount to keep track of server structures returned from failover

2016-03-03 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 04:50:33PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (23/10/15 10:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:50:07AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: > >> On 10/11/2015 10:00 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >> >Hi, > >> > > >> >the attached patches are my proposal to fix > >>

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Use refcount to keep track of server structures returned from failover

2016-03-03 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (23/10/15 10:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:50:07AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: >> On 10/11/2015 10:00 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >the attached patches are my proposal to fix >> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2829 >> > >> >I haven't tested them past

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH SET] TOOL: Invalidation of sudo rules at sss_cache

2016-03-03 Thread Pavel Březina
On 03/03/2016 02:00 PM, Petr Cech wrote: Hi, I found an interesting thing. I wonder if this is a bug or not. I tried to write a test for sysdb_sudo_store() function: # src/db/sysdb_sudo.h errno_t sysdb_sudo_store (struct * sss_domain_info domain, struct sysdb_attrs ** rules, size_t num_rules);

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH SET] TOOL: Invalidation of sudo rules at sss_cache

2016-03-03 Thread Petr Cech
Hi, I found an interesting thing. I wonder if this is a bug or not. I tried to write a test for sysdb_sudo_store() function: # src/db/sysdb_sudo.h errno_t sysdb_sudo_store (struct * sss_domain_info domain, struct sysdb_attrs ** rules, size_t num_rules); As far as I see first parameter

[SSSD] [PATCH] GPO_CHILD: Create directories in gpo_cache with right permissions

2016-03-03 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
ehlo, review is appreciated. LS >From 812846b5ddd5b786a776f9813ac58b9735bba1ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Slebodnik Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:34:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] GPO: Soften umask in gpo_child MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] cache_req improvements

2016-03-03 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (02/03/16 18:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:05:48PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: >> On 02/26/2016 01:47 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:41:24PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: >> From f61d0192b8254247802167ea385b52f65d4e175d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001