[SSSD] [sssd PR#514][comment] Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514 Title: #514: Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13 lslebodn commented: """ sssd-1-13: * 99afca8926fb211774de457e750dea27da8ac3a9 * 42dbd7ee691ffef8b136fc310128aadfd91fd70c * f6afb6f9418735bcfd125eb2bb2ffeeb5cc07d99 """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514#issuecomment-367949323 ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] [sssd PR#514][comment] Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514 Title: #514: Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13 lslebodn commented: """ Thank you very much for additional info in commit messages. ACK """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514#issuecomment-367948868 ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] [sssd PR#514][comment] Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514 Title: #514: Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13 jhrozek commented: """ Hi @lslebodn could you take a look at the patches no later than Monday? I'm on PTO the rest of the next week and I'd like the patches to be merged downstream sooner. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514#issuecomment-367784874 ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] [sssd PR#514][comment] Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514 Title: #514: Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13 jhrozek commented: """ It doesn't make much sense to backport commit afadeb1 because it fixes an issue that was only uncovered by the way cache-req evaluates results. It looks like the patches from PR#496 don't conflict here, so I just amended the commit messages. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514#issuecomment-367612479 ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] [sssd PR#514][comment] Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514 Title: #514: Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13 lslebodn commented: """ As part of backporting patches for sanitizing sysdb filters, we found out that we might consider backporting also afadeb1a530ff010a2f9a7552562576b843c874b. You might need to wait for CVE backport to avoid conflicts """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514#issuecomment-367377399 ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] [sssd PR#514][comment] Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514 Title: #514: Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13 jhrozek commented: """ Kind of a bit of both. If the cherry-pick conflict couldn't be resolved trivially, I just opened the code from master and adjusted sssd-1-13 to match the behaviour in master. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514#issuecomment-365969076 ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
[SSSD] [sssd PR#514][comment] Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514 Title: #514: Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13 lslebodn commented: """ The commits "Fix iterating to next domain for initgroup lookups" and "Make get_object_from_cache() aware of UPN searches" does not have any info about commits in other/newer branches. Were they written from scratch? or you just forgot to mention that in commit message. If it is just a subset of change from bigger patch in master then it would still be good to mention that in commit message. (or at least ticket partially fix that in master) """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514#issuecomment-365856535 ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
