On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 11:53 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Sumit,
> > I can't do a successful build with this patch, it says errno_t is
> > re-defined in sss_cli.h when parsing util.h
> >
> > Does it depend on other patches ?
> > Can you check it again against current master ?
> >
>
> ah, sorry, t
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:38:14AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:25 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >
> > I have include the check in the sss_client directory, but I'm
> > reluctant
> > to add it to common, too. IMO the maintainers of the packages should
> > decide if errno_t make
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:25 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> I have include the check in the sss_client directory, but I'm
> reluctant
> to add it to common, too. IMO the maintainers of the packages should
> decide if errno_t makes sense for them or not. A second argument would
> be that in most cases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/26/2009 07:25 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:53:23AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/24/2009 05:05 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we regular use functions
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:53:23AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/24/2009 05:05 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we regular use functions returning errno error code like ENOMEN or
> > EINVAL. The return type of these functions is u
