Hi,
this patch should fix #521 by setting the unitialized return code to
EPERM.
bye.
Sumit
From acefb8cc713d1cc3e56f2815e2cdb1fc292a8ccc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose sb...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:42:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add a missing return value
---
On 06/09/2010 06:52 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this patch should fix #521 by setting the unitialized return code to
EPERM.
Ack.
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:56:33AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 06/09/2010 06:52 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this patch should fix #521 by setting the unitialized return code to
EPERM.
Ack.
sorry, EPERM is not the right return value here, because there is no
error in the current
On 06/09/2010 08:20 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 06/09/2010 08:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:56:33AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 06/09/2010 06:52 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this patch should fix #521 by setting the unitialized return code to
EPERM.
Ack.