On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:51 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/15/2009 09:45 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/15/2009 09:37 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:16:24AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the m4
>> directories to be included in the tarball.
>>
>
> ACK
>
> SLE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/15/2009 09:45 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the
>> m4
>> directories to be included in the tarball.
>
> Is there any way to
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the
> m4
> directories to be included in the tarball.
Is there any way to have symlinks between these directories, we have 5
or more copies of the same files (AFAIK) there
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:16:24AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the m4
> directories to be included in the tarball.
>
ACK
SLES10 needs this, too.
bye,
Sumit
___
sssd-devel mailing l
Due to differences in autotools, building RPMS on RHEL5 requires the m4
directories to be included in the tarball.
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
From ff0b8bfa91a46fe28a088ad52738d56d63b9c8ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: S
