On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 08:12:06AM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> >+struct be_sbus_reply_data {
> >+dbus_uint16_t err_maj;
> >+dbus_uint32_t err_min;
> >+const char *err_msg;
> >+};
> >+
> >+#define BE_SBUS_REPLY_DATA_INIT { .err_maj = DP_ERR_FATAL, \
>
On 11/11/2015 02:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the prime reasons for #2861 was copy-pasting code. The
two attached patches reduce the code duplication and hopefully will make
future additions to Data Provider safer.
Ideas on different solutions are welcome!
+static errno_t
On 11/11/2015 02:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the prime reasons for #2861 was copy-pasting code. The
two attached patches reduce the code duplication and hopefully will make
future additions to Data Provider safer.
Ideas on different solutions are welcome!
Hello Jakub,
I
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 08:29:42AM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 11/12/2015 01:08 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:03:33PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>>On 11/11/2015 02:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I think one of the prime reasons for #2861 was
On 11/11/2015 02:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the prime reasons for #2861 was copy-pasting code. The
two attached patches reduce the code duplication and hopefully will make
future additions to Data Provider safer.
Ideas on different solutions are welcome!
Hi Jakub,
I am
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:03:33PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 11/11/2015 02:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I think one of the prime reasons for #2861 was copy-pasting code. The
> >two attached patches reduce the code duplication and hopefully will make
> >future additions to Data
On 11/12/2015 01:08 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:03:33PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
>On 11/11/2015 02:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I think one of the prime reasons for #2861 was copy-pasting code. The
> >two attached patches reduce the code duplication and
Hi,
I think one of the prime reasons for #2861 was copy-pasting code. The
two attached patches reduce the code duplication and hopefully will make
future additions to Data Provider safer.
Ideas on different solutions are welcome!
>From f6e929d4132a23d23a9016e43f4b870780c53032 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
