On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 03:19:42PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 08/27/2015 05:49 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
> >
> >I agree. Attached is the same patch that was already ACKed,
> >just with the changed name and added const.
> >
> >Michal
>
> Yes, it is the same, with const.
>
> ACK again.
>
> Petr
On 08/27/2015 05:49 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
I agree. Attached is the same patch that was already ACKed,
just with the changed name and added const.
Michal
Yes, it is the same, with const.
ACK again.
Petr
___
sssd-devel mailing list
On 08/27/2015 01:01 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (19/08/15 20:26), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
This is another patch to avoid failing tests
in the CI (make-check-valgrind). This time
the ldap_id_cleanup tests.
Looks like the one second cache timeout was too short
and the tests sometimes failed
On (19/08/15 20:26), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
This is another patch to avoid failing tests
in the CI (make-check-valgrind). This time
the ldap_id_cleanup tests.
Looks like the one second cache timeout was too short
and the tests sometimes failed because they expected the
entries to be still valid
On 08/19/2015 08:26 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
This is another patch to avoid failing tests
in the CI (make-check-valgrind). This time
the ldap_id_cleanup tests.
Looks like the one second cache timeout was too short
and the tests sometimes failed because they expected the
entries to be still
Hi!
This is another patch to avoid failing tests
in the CI (make-check-valgrind). This time
the ldap_id_cleanup tests.
Looks like the one second cache timeout was too short
and the tests sometimes failed because they expected the
entries to be still valid for a short while
after they were added
