URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/167
Title: #167: Add missing dyndns_auth option to AD and IPA provider man pages
lslebodn commented:
"""
master:
* 5424b90e870cf2b9d379df185cb6893c7f8b040c
LS
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/167#issuecomment-284848847
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/167
Title: #167: Add missing dyndns_auth option to AD and IPA provider man pages
jhrozek commented:
"""
I think I was just trying to encourage the users to stick to the secure
defaults. But given that the default AD and IPA configuration would reject
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/167
Title: #167: Add missing dyndns_auth option to AD and IPA provider man pages
justin-stephenson commented:
"""
If that is the case, then I am fine if you would like to go ahead and close
this PR. I just saw a customer using this option recently.
"""
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/167
Title: #167: Add missing dyndns_auth option to AD and IPA provider man pages
lslebodn commented:
"""
I thought it was not documented intentionally.
The same as other insecure options for tls.
@jhrozek should know because he is an author :-)
LS
"""
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/167
Title: #167: Add missing dyndns_auth option to AD and IPA provider man pages
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/167#issuecomment-282076596
