URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/451
Title: #451: BUILD: Disable tests with know failures
jhrozek commented:
"""
* master: .44bc6e8f49eec9e7ab9a952845bffcc0fd3b3a44
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/451#issuecomment-345060225
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/451
Title: #451: BUILD: Disable tests with know failures
fidencio commented:
"""
Unfortunately, as PR #454 is not passing our CI and also has some comments to
be addressed (which most likely won't happen till next week), let's have this
PR merged ASAP
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/451
Title: #451: BUILD: Disable tests with know failures
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
Here is the PR:
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/454
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/451#issuecomment-344992710
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/451
Title: #451: BUILD: Disable tests with know failures
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
@lslebodn yeah I see (just tried the patch)... the tests need to be modified
and that part in the branch may not be even necessary... so forget the branch,
I will push new
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/451
Title: #451: BUILD: Disable tests with know failures
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (16/11/17 12:40), mzidek-rh wrote:
>Here is the branch if interested to look at the scope, but as I said I need to
>run it in the environment where it was failing before
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/451
Title: #451: BUILD: Disable tests with know failures
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
Here is the branch if interested to look at the scope, but as I said I need to
run it in the environment where it was failing before submitting PR
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/451
Title: #451: BUILD: Disable tests with know failures
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
Sorry I forgot about this. I do have a patch for
https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3563 in ordererd-string-arrays (I just pushed
the branch to gh). But I only tested it on
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/451
Title: #451: BUILD: Disable tests with know failures
fidencio commented:
"""
Although the patch looks good and there's a strong motivation behind this
(having our internal CI tests passing), I'd like to hear from @mzidek-rh about
what's the status of
