On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:52:48PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> Thank you for review.
> I prefer one return point per function.
>
> Petr
>
> PS: New patch is attached.
ACK
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
On (11/12/15 12:41), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:52:48PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
>> Thank you for review.
>> I prefer one return point per function.
>>
>> Petr
>>
>> PS: New patch is attached.
>
>ACK
master:
* 565e6d91814884054ec0dc4d770804d7bf472d3f
sssd-1-13:
*
On (10/12/15 11:26), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:57:02PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
>> On 12/07/2015 03:43 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:33:51PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
>> >>So, I have choose the 2) option and the patch is attached.
>> >
>> >I think this
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:57:02PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 12/07/2015 03:43 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:33:51PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>So, I have choose the 2) option and the patch is attached.
> >
> >I think this patch goes in the right direction, but still
On 12/10/2015 11:33 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/12/15 11:26), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:57:02PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
On 12/07/2015 03:43 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:33:51PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
One style nitpick and then we can push
On 12/07/2015 03:43 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:33:51PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
So, I have choose the 2) option and the patch is attached.
I think this patch goes in the right direction, but still needs more
work. See inline.
Hello Jakub,
thank you for careful review.
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:33:51PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> So, I have choose the 2) option and the patch is attached.
I think this patch goes in the right direction, but still needs more
work. See inline.
> And something more:
> a.bak ... log before patch
> b.bak ... log after patch
>
>
On 12/03/2015 05:26 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:02:39PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
On 11/27/2015 10:35 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:57:56PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
On 11/12/2015 06:04 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:54:21PM +0100,
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:02:39PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 11/27/2015 10:35 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:57:56PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>On 11/12/2015 06:04 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:54:21PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> >On
On 11/27/2015 10:35 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:57:56PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
On 11/12/2015 06:04 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:54:21PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
On 11/11/2015 02:42 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi, I think it's a good idea to only say
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:57:56PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 11/12/2015 06:04 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:54:21PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>>On 11/11/2015 02:42 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi, I think it's a good idea to only say we don't handle services for
>
On 11/19/2015 05:57 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 11/12/2015 06:04 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:54:21PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
>On 11/11/2015 02:42 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi, I think it's a good idea to only say we don't handle services
for
> >IPA subdomains. But I also
On 11/12/2015 06:04 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:54:21PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
>On 11/11/2015 02:42 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi, I think it's a good idea to only say we don't handle services for
> >IPA subdomains. But I also think it would be better to shortcut the
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
