URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/496
Title: #496: sysdb: sanitize search filter input - backport sssd-1-13
lslebodn commented:
"""
I added in-line comment.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/496#issuecomment-365637557
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/496
Title: #496: sysdb: sanitize search filter input - backport sssd-1-13
Label: +Changes requested
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/503
Author: lslebodn
Title: #503: Regression test for false possitive "corrupted" memory cache
Action: synchronized
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/503/head:pr503
git checkout pr503
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
fidencio commented:
"""
Adding the "Accepted" label as per @simo5's review and @olivergs's tests.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498#issuecomment-365685945
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
olivergs commented:
"""
After testing this patch in a clean environment it worked like a charm.
Thanks!
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
Label: +Accepted
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/503
Title: #503: Regression test for false possitive "corrupted" memory cache
lslebodn commented:
"""
> @lslebodn, I would it call just 'flags' as e.g. open(2).
What about latest version?
It is be backward compatible including negative test cases. But it
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/514
Author: jhrozek
Title: #514: Backport several UPN related patches to sssd-1-13
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
There are several patches that were applied to master, but never to sssd-1-13.
The patches are needed to enable UPN logins in both direct join
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
Label: +Pushed
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
jhrozek commented:
"""
* master:
* f0cbe890adf696d8318373203580d709f3d38d8c
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Author: fidencio
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
Action: closed
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/498/head:pr498
git checkout pr498
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 12:58:26PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> Hi team,
> as you know, I have been working on this occasionally for a long time now.
> The code can be found at [1].
>
> It is completely new implementation of our internal D-Bus API called sbus. I
> took all the good things
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/391
Author: lslebodn
Title: #391: Use dbus-daemon in cwrap enviroment for test
Action: synchronized
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/391/head:pr391
git checkout pr391
From
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/515
Title: #515: sssctl: Showing help even when sssd not configured
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/515#issuecomment-365845133
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/515
Title: #515: sssctl: Showing help even when sssd not configured
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/515#issuecomment-365845134
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/515
Author: amitkumar50
Title: #515: sssctl: Showing help even when sssd not configured
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
Current Issue:
On a clean and unconfigured system, it's not possible
to use --help.
`# dnf install sssd-tools`
`# sssctl cache-remove
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
lslebodn commented:
"""
Unfortunately, it was pushed without careful review.
That would not work when running sssd in non-privileged mode because `seteuid`
will fail.
And it was mentioned in
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
Label: -Pushed
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
fidencio commented:
"""
@lslebodn,
I'd like to ask you to have a ticket opened about this and we'll treat it from
there.
Also, @simo5, would you mind giving your opinion here?
"""
See the
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
Label: +Pushed
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Author: fidencio
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
Action: closed
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/498/head:pr498
git checkout pr498
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
Label: -Accepted
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/498
Author: fidencio
Title: #498: DESKPROFILE: Do not require CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
Action: reopened
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/498/head:pr498
git checkout pr498
23 matches
Mail list logo
