On 07/17/2015 01:26 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I have read the wiki pages. And I have the edited version. It would be
difficult to send the diff, so I started a new pages where you can
view the result.
Original pages:
[ 1] https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Contribute
[ 2] https
to discussion. I look forward to your views.
Petr
From 511224743e8d8e788e9701f0fb3db418ca12b506 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:59:31 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] DATA_PROVIDER: BE_REQ as string in log message
Add be_req2str() for translation BE_REQ
inline.
I agree.
Those tests have another logic. So I returned them back.
Petr
From 63defe03797a8a9038e49400089a732bd35efaca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:44:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] TESTS: Removing part of responder_cache_req-tests
If you call
On 07/23/2015 02:44 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Hi,
see the attached patch for ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1697
I think this is a candidate to include in our
coding guidelines.
I agree. It is a candidate.
Thanks,
Michal
___
of changes in source files that
require both of them.
Thanks.
There is repaired patch attached.
Petr
From 7f154378f56a01ca65bfeba9985c605214d628b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:59:31 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] DATA_PROVIDER: BE_REQ as string in log
aebda5def026d7a0fc40c4034ef18ba97ada5f36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:59:31 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] DATA_PROVIDER: BE_REQ as string in log message
Add be_req2str() for translation BE_REQ to string.
So we will have
|| Got request for [0x1001][FAST
On 08/21/2015 01:33 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/20/2015 01:50 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/19/2015 08:26 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
This is another patch to avoid failing tests
in the CI (make-check-valgrind). This time
the ldap_id_cleanup tests.
Looks like the one second cache timeout
On 08/19/2015 08:26 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
This is another patch to avoid failing tests
in the CI (make-check-valgrind). This time
the ldap_id_cleanup tests.
Looks like the one second cache timeout was too short
and the tests sometimes failed because they expected the
entries to be still
On 08/13/2015 11:11 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
From a93e36f11759cf9a748942e7632d4a07a088b098 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 07:17:28 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] UTIL: Function 2string for enum sss_cli_command
Improvement of debug messages.
Instead
On 08/17/2015 08:52 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
From c871c97862997df4e724647f1a0ce7297f2f059b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cechpc...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:17:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] TEST: Fix for responder_cache_req-tests
Tests, that do not pass, have a problem with
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:52:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] BUILD: Repair dependecies on deprecated libraries
From systemd version 209 up, there are no modules -login
and -journal. M4 macro can switch the libraries due to
systemd version.
Resolves:
https
On 07/28/2015 01:34 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (28/07/15 11:58), Petr Cech wrote:
From fcf895ad8df932403dfc554a34ff0d8ceac72785 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:52:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] BUILD: Repair dependecies on deprecated libraries
On 07/29/2015 08:51 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:19:33AM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello, please see trivial patch attached.
While I was investigating case I found that to access value of
'ldap_purge_cache_timeout' option I need to use enum value
On 07/24/2015 09:46 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
patch is attached.
LS
0001-SPEC-Update-spec-file-for-krb5_local_auth_plugin.patch
From 9474dfc64cbd73ab25bf12660f6b55e5563fe14c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodniklsleb...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:24:31 +0200
On 08/13/2015 12:48 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
From eef083f774988fe8e6b6a5a8513a163fd7558b55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?=pbrez...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:46:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] IFP: use default limit if provided is 0
Hi,
CI:
ping :-)
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
ATTACHMENTS:
[1] cpu_braker.c
[2] 0001-TEST-Observation-patch.patch
From b58608eaadca863b28b0cc80b0588fa536d508b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:41:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [TEST]: Observation patch
This patch is part of reproducer, nothing
On 08/13/2015 07:49 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/08/15 17:57), Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I have explored in detail why the test responder_cache_req-tests failed so
often. I created a new VM with RHEL 6.7.
OBSERVATION:
How we know, CI machines are under pressure, so I wrote simple
] hbac_evaluate() ]
Thanks.
Petr
From 2fcf13ef59f00b460afa77b27ef6cc2789b06393 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:56:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [HBAC]: Better libhbac debuging
Added support for logging via external log function.
Log provides information about
type as hexadecimal number. Maybe there are also other places.
LS
Petr
From a93e36f11759cf9a748942e7632d4a07a088b098 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 07:17:28 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] UTIL: Function 2string for enum sss_cli_command
Improvement
-- be_get_account_info,
the second is from
src/responder/common/responder_dp -- sss_dp_get_account_msg
Thanks.
Petr
From 78ba1b38af081001eaefae180adc4a45e8c673d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 02:26:29 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] DATA_PROVIDER: BE_REQ as string
On 07/13/2015 11:02 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:38:09AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
sorry about the vacation-induced delay. This is a very useful proposal,
see inline for my comments.
I've read the wiki according to
# https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2706
On 10/05/2015 10:21 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:05:14PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
ping
I can't start sssd as a service with this patch applied after switching
from root to non-root:
1) add user=sssd to the [sssd] section
2) chown root.root /var/log/sssd/*.log
How to reproduce:
Sumit wrote explanation to ticket comment. Better is if .log files
missing. And you need run SSSD logging only to journal. Lukas wrote in
soe mail above in thread, how to enable it.
Thanks to all.
Petr
___
sssd-devel mailing list
On 10/23/2015 02:18 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
How to reproduce:
Sumit wrote explanation to ticket comment. Better is if .log files
missing. And you need run SSSD logging only to journal. Lukas wrote in
soe mail above in thread, how to enable it.
Thanks to all.
Petr
# sudo bash
# systemctl stop
rom e3dd543eec09f6e4386bfe6f1505538575fe5356 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech <pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:34:08 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] TEST: Add test_user_by_recent_filter_valid
Test users_by_filter_valid() was removed in past. We will add two new
tests instead of it. Logic
On 10/27/2015 02:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
SSSDBG_CONF_SETTINGS is reserved for configuration information. These
pings are generally just noise (when they fail, this is logged at
SSDBG_FATAL_FAILURE). We should only log these at SSSDBG_TRACE_INTERNAL.
Hi Stephen,
CI tests are right:
On 10/12/2015 11:37 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> From a15acee2495ee12190e711f3344e14c54fc73062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Petr Cech<pc...@redhat.com>
>Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 08:57:15 -0400
>Subject: [PATCH 10/11] KRB5_CHILD: More restrictive umask
>
>We could us
On 11/10/2015 08:29 AM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 11/05/2015 05:29 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
+void test_groups_by_recent_filter_valid(void **state)
+{
+struct cache_req_test_ctx *test_ctx = NULL;
+TALLOC_CTX *req_mem_ctx = NULL;
+struct tevent_req *req = NULL;
+const char
On 11/10/2015 08:37 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/11/15 08:29), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 11/05/2015 05:29 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
+void test_groups_by_recent_filter_valid(void **state)
+{
+struct cache_req_test_ctx *test_ctx = NULL;
+TALLOC_CTX *req_mem_ctx = NULL;
+struct
On 11/09/2015 04:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 05:29:25PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
>On 11/04/2015 11:11 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Sorry it took so long to get back to the review. I only have some minor
> >comments, see inline..
>
On 11/11/2015 09:32 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>Hi Jakub,
>
>I just sent the patch to the CI tests and they passed
>http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/32/63/summary.html
>
> >Then I would prefer undocumented. It matches how we (don't) document the
> >"command" option.
>I agree with little
Hello,
please see first attempt of patch for:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2747
Regards
Petr
PS:
# reproducer
getent services -s sss l...@cygnus.dev
>From 64d952f188e86a00c26ccbe26ad09231e6b6de2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech <pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2
On 11/09/2015 07:17 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
There are problems inherent with passing the PID to the child process.
There's no guarantee that the process still exists. In the worst-case,
the PID could actually be reassigned to a new process and the output
you got back from something like
On 11/10/2015 10:44 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
The function gettext was not detected properly with strict
cflags even thought it was part of glibc.
sh$ CFLAGS="-Werror" ./configure
sh$ grep gt_cv_func_gnugettext config.log
gt_cv_func_gnugettext1_libc=no
gt_cv_func_gnugettext1_libintl=no
On 11/11/2015 12:25 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:07:46AM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
>On 11/11/2015 09:32 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>Hi Jakub,
> >>>
> >>>I just sent the patch to the CI tests and they passed
> >>>htt
On 11/11/2015 02:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the prime reasons for #2861 was copy-pasting code. The
two attached patches reduce the code duplication and hopefully will make
future additions to Data Provider safer.
Ideas on different solutions are welcome!
Hi Jakub,
I am
On 11/12/2015 01:08 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:03:33PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
>On 11/11/2015 02:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I think one of the prime reasons for #2861 was copy-pasting code. The
> >two attached patches
On 11/12/2015 06:30 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:49:33AM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
>On 11/11/2015 12:25 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:07:46AM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>>On 11/11/2015 09:32 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
bump
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
On 11/13/2015 11:32 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:52:08AM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
>On 11/13/2015 10:30 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
> >On 11/13/2015 10:27 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>
> >>Patches are rebased now. I hope it will be ok now.
> >>
On 11/13/2015 12:27 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
+req_mem_ctx = talloc_new(test_ctx->tctx);
> >>+check_leaks_push(req_mem_ctx);
> >
> >I think the last question is whether we want to use this new context or
> >just call check_leaks_push(test_ctx) recursively. I don't really mind
> >too much,
On 11/13/2015 08:20 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
>Hi Jakub,
>
>it works due to your reproducer. It is really need to have
>setenforce == 1
You meant setenforce 0, right?
Hi Jakub,
yes, of course, I meant setenforce 1. It was mistake.
--^-- 1 -->
On 11/13/2015 10:09 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi, patch 003 doesn't apply cleanly for me, can you rebase?
Patches are rebased now. I hope it will be ok now.
Petr
>From 3e43417db9b66bdb44d60b5f186156c5ac26ad4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech <pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oc
On 11/13/2015 10:27 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
Patches are rebased now. I hope it will be ok now.
Petr
Sorry, now my local CI tests failed... I will rebase it again.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https
On 11/11/2015 02:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the prime reasons for #2861 was copy-pasting code. The
two attached patches reduce the code duplication and hopefully will make
future additions to Data Provider safer.
Ideas on different solutions are welcome!
Hello Jakub,
I
00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech <pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 09:51:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] IPA_PROVIDER: Explicit no handle of services
Services for IPA subdomains aren't handled by SSSD. This patch add
quick shortcut to avoid sending an LDAP query.
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted
On 11/11/2015 08:04 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/11/15 07:58), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 11/09/2015 08:06 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>ehlo,
>>
>>You can see a leak in talloc report.
>>But it was ignored. So we didn't notice it for long time.
>>http://sssd-ci
On 11/09/2015 08:06 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
You can see a leak in talloc report.
But it was ignored. So we didn't notice it for long time.
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/29/90/rhel7/ci-build-debug/src/tests/cwrap/become_user-tests.log
The first patch fixes the leak and the last
On 11/10/2015 04:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:22:54PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (10/11/15 13:15), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:32:30AM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>On 11/04/2015 11:24 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> &
On 11/04/2015 11:24 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I created this patch to try to diagnose an issue where sssd would
randomly restart on any of machines in a VM cluster without giving too
much advise why. I think it might be useful to merge in general.
Hi Jakub,
I reviewed the patch. Code looks
On 10/27/2015 09:42 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
The removed tests were:
* users_by_filter_valid
* users_by_filter_multiple_domains_valid
* groups_by_filter_valid
* groups_by_filter_multiple_domains_valid
Hello,
another patch set is attached.
This patch set covers groups_by_filter_valid
On 11/02/2015 03:09 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 11/02/2015 03:03 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
please see simple patch attached.
Thanks!
LGTM, I am waiting for CI :-)
Petr
CI tests passed:
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/31/85/summary.html
=> ACK
P
On 11/02/2015 03:03 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
please see simple patch attached.
Thanks!
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
LGTM, I am waiting for CI :-)
On 10/21/2015 03:19 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 10/12/2015 11:37 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> From a15acee2495ee12190e711f3344e14c54fc73062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Petr Cech<pc...@redhat.com>
>Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 08:57:15 -0400
>Subject: [PATCH 10/11] KRB5_CHILD: More restr
and resend in a single set.
Thanks for the tests!
> From e3dd543eec09f6e4386bfe6f1505538575fe5356 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Petr Cech<pc...@redhat.com>
>Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:34:08 -0400
>Subject: [PATCH 1/3] TEST: Add test_user_by_recent_filter_valid
>
>Te
ping
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
with Sumit (thanks).
I'd like to ask about any special care at patch 0010-KRB5-CHILD.
I investigated it, but second look will be better.
Regards
Petr
>From 97f8c14b58f29cf3ce341ead29f17204faa60f3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech <pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:38
On 10/12/2015 11:37 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 03:55:17PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
On 10/04/2015 09:39 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Finally, because I'm a lazy reviewer, I would prefer:
- a patch that converts 0177 to DFL, with a comment around the macro
definition
Hi everyone,
we just discussed 'function wrapper' topic offline.
I agree that it is not ideal to add new parameter to the function. And I
agree that in languages like C, we have return value model.
On the other hand, we have clean code on our minds. So I think that
wrappers like:
# int
On 09/03/2015 04:02 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
I just updated the wiki pages. I will send another mail for it.
But in this thread, I would like to note, what is exactly done.
Original pages:
[ 1] https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Contribute
[ 2] https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DevelTips
[ 3
Hi!
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2703
It's my first patch to this ticket. It is simple transforming of number
of command to the string.
Petr
From ca782a1518480635ef60bc2cdf77d9b8644132b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 07:17:28 -0400
On 07/08/2015 02:46 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 07/08/2015 02:13 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi!
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2703
It's my first patch to this ticket. It is simple transforming of
number of command to the string.
Petr
Hello Petr,
thank for the patch!
I haven't tested
Hi,
I've read the wiki according to
# https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2706
and I think that it could be helpful clean the page
# https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DevelTutorials
from git topic and create new page for everything related to git.
The motivation is, that:
* Contribute
at 02:13:42PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi!
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2703
It's my first patch to this ticket. It is simple transforming of number of
command to the string.
Hi Petr,
welcome and thank you for your first patch. Besides Pavel's suggestions
I have some general comments
On 08/28/2015 09:18 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (28/08/15 09:03), Petr Cech wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to ask you what you think about the initialization of iterative
variables in forloops. I know that present code style does not allow it. But
how I recognized, we use C99
On 08/28/2015 03:13 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
I am doing code review for fixed patch now. Patch looks good to me and
it works.
I discussed the problem above (about fprintf vs. libpopt) with both
offline. The libpopt solution starts here [1] and I agree it would not
be straightforward. So I am
On 08/28/2015 12:25 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
I would be also curious why you need to provide hacks
for printing argument description for autohelp.
There is a much more elegant way how to do it with libpopt.
(small hint POPT_ARGFLAG_DOC_HIDDEN in sss_tool_common_opts)
Your curiosity is
On 08/27/2015 05:49 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
I agree. Attached is the same patch that was already ACKed,
just with the changed name and added const.
Michal
Yes, it is the same, with const.
ACK again.
Petr
___
sssd-devel mailing list
.
There is improved patch attached.
Petr
From baf0f51e8444bb0862efe4347d245f0b01834cfc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech pc...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:59:31 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] DATA_PROVIDER: BE_REQ as string in log message
Add be_req2str() for translation BE_REQ to string.
So
On 08/24/2015 03:45 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 07/24/2015 06:20 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
From 2fcf13ef59f00b460afa77b27ef6cc2789b06393 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cechpc...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:56:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [HBAC]: Better libhbac debuging
s/debuging
. I agree.
On 08/26/2015 09:44 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
0001-TESTS-Fixing-of-uninitialized-pointer.patch
Nice catch! Ci passed. ACK to this patch
Thanks.
0002-HBAC-Better-libhbac-debugging.patch
From 75d97a5336e2b66d4bb187ce024ad9be9b2702b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech
On 08/31/2015 01:32 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
0x2000
(Mon Aug 31 07:03:04 2015) [sssd[be[cygnus.dev]]] [hbac] (0x0100):
[../src/providers/ipa/hbac_evaluator.c:152] [< hbac_evaluate()
(Mon Aug 31 07:03:04 2015) [sssd[be[cygnus.dev]]] [hbac] (0x2000):
[../src/providers/ipa/hbac_evaluator.c:409]
On 08/31/2015 01:09 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (29/08/15 14:33), Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to ask you what you think about the initialization of
iterative variables in forloops
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
I am sorry. There is a fix attached.
Petr
>From 93dbe494d14df22b6e33d100d40a3665a2990e56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech <pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 02:40:36 -0400
Su
Hi,
I just updated the wiki pages. I removed some duplicated
and outdated info. I hope that the pages are now clearer.
Petr
PS: If you need more info, see thread "[SSSD] [WIKI] Contribute and
DevelTips are duplicate".
___
sssd-devel mailing list
On 09/02/2015 05:47 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:18:24PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
On 08/17/2015 02:21 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 07/17/2015 01:26 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I have read the wiki pages. And I have the edited version. It would be
difficult to send the diff
Hi,
reverting this commit "5e9bc89b28f1ac3ce573ecdece74fe9623580c28" fixed
the problem for me. So is the original commit no longer valid?
Regards,
Petr
>From 3a161789fc8ef82f4636e55369f4c5b04985f7c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech <pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Wed,
On 09/04/2015 03:24 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 09/03/2015 03:45 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
I tried both case. I used only originalMemberOf and I had right
hostgroups,
>no user groups. Then I used only memberOf and I had no hostgroups,
right
>user groups.
>
>So I did little hack, we co
nes like:
# { "ldap_user_member_of", "memberOf", SYSDB_ORIG_MEMBEROF, NULL }
and it works for me.
I hope that meaning of this patch is saving user/POSIX group memberOf
attribute to originalMemberOf attribute.
Regards,
Petr
>From a5b0e35de6a9cb6e9e1881deaae9fa55701aa33a
On 09/08/2015 03:31 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
I would rather used option d) than option a). (Do not change anything)
Option b) does not require namespacing, because it is a local macro.
Option c) is the most readable, but there is a collision with gnu gettext.
So it cannot be used.
LS
Only
On 09/03/2015 08:18 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 06:15:24AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/09/15 18:06), Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
reverting this commit "5e9bc89b28f1ac3ce573ecdece74fe9623580c28" fixed the
problem for me. So is the original commit no longer va
On 09/03/2015 10:08 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:54:51AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:31:07AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
On 09/03/2015 08:18 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 06:15:24AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/09/15 18:06
On 09/01/2015 11:00 AM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
From 6b1c6cac7123e78a2c55c51019b66a6bcf97ec29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech<pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:56:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] HBAC: Better libhbac debugging
Added support for logging via external log fu
On 08/25/2015 01:00 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2758
Hi Pavel,
I have 3 formal comments to coding style.
Now I am running the tests. I will send you mail
with results soon.
Petr
0001-sss_override-document-debug-options.patch
From
On 08/25/2015 01:36 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
+static void sss_tool_print_common_opts(void)
+{
+fprintf(stderr, _(Common options:\n));
+fprintf(stderr, -d, --debug=INT%s\n,
+_(Enable debug at level));
I'm not sure, but is it habbit to indent to '('?
I mean:
On 09/04/2015 04:32 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 08/28/2015 04:31 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
+ "Got request for [%#x][%s][%d][%s]\n", type, be_req2str(type),
+ attr_type, filter);
Petr do you think it could be useful to print attr_type as a string?
We talked about
Hi,
I am reviewing umask() in our code according to
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2424
There are many use like umask(DFL_RSP_UMASK):
src/responder/autofs/autofssrv.c:223
src/responder/ifp/ifpsrv.c:401
src/responder/nss/nsssrv.c:589
src/responder/pac/pacsrv.c:232
Hi,
patch for
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2493
is attached.
Petr
>From 1d87d8dd390c229ac603569a604d9cca656c3f1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech <pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:05:59 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] DEBUG: Preventing chown_debug_file if
0.1.0 {
+global:
+hbac_evaluate;
+} IPA_HBAC_0.0.1;
--
>From 3b235cdc2c8d55dbaac9a78f82bef12576346b97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech <pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 02:50:26 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] TESTS: Fixing of uninitialized pointer.
There was a bug with uninitialized pointer during solvin
variable debug_to_stderr.
Petr
>From 8cb0a4a6b59259e9096ae6f5926595b7b10d6b27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech <pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:05:59 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] DEBUG: Preventing chown_debug_file if journald on
There is function chown_debug_file() which did
On 09/14/2015 01:34 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 09/14/2015 01:32 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
0001:
Use extra flag also in OOB request.
0002:
Provide support for UPN. This add an improvement from NSS code, but I'm
not sure if it is desired or not.
If you have [domain/AD.PB] in sssd.conf and UPN
On 09/14/2015 03:25 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:15:39PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
From 4246d5cd91c4c34b8524be5bfce38c57163a6e2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik<lsleb...@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:04:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] squ
Hi Pavel!
There is some code between my last end and this continuation. I was read
it and did't find anything wrong.
On 09/16/2015 04:26 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
0003-cache_req-tests-reduce-code-duplication.patch
From e41f96a47f2b0f8d3e07e34af83e9a516d29df34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From
On 09/11/2015 01:47 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:27:17PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I am reviewing umask() in our code according to
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2424
There are many use like umask(DFL_RSP_UMASK):
src/responder/autofs/autofssrv.c:223
src/responder
On 09/30/2015 11:15 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:53:24AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
It's https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2808 . Please add ideas and
suggestions how those tags shall look like.
Thanks, I ressurected
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1372 from
On 10/01/2015 01:19 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 12:38:49PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
Bump.
Thanks for reply, Jakub.
Why was 077 changed for 0177?
This change is something, which I think was discussed earlier in this
thread.
# pcech:
# > I would like to ask you if
On 09/18/2015 04:30 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hello,
there are fixed patches attached.
Bump.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Bump.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
will send whole patch.
Regards
Petr
PS: I applied my patch after 000*-cache_req_*. Those patches are on list.
>From aa0b0ab7c0a95ff47d5003907730c5432ff7bb85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Cech <pc...@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:34:08 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] TEST: recent_valid filte
1 - 100 of 390 matches
Mail list logo
