URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/32
Title: #32: Requesting a pull to SSSD:master from fidencio:wip/#3138
fidencio commented:
"""
This PR doesn't make sense anymore in the state that this branch is.
I'm closing the PR and a new one will be re-open by whoever ends up working on
this in the
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/32
Title: #32: Requesting a pull to SSSD:master from fidencio:wip/#3138
jhrozek commented:
"""
Yes, as discussed, moving this functionality to the monitor is something we'll
go with. Therefore I'm adding the Changes requested label.
"""
See the full
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/32
Title: #32: Requesting a pull to SSSD:master from fidencio:wip/#3138
simo5 commented:
"""
The problem of using genconf is race conditions and the fact it won't be
possible to call it again after the service is started.
I am for adding socket activation
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/32
Title: #32: Requesting a pull to SSSD:master from fidencio:wip/#3138
fidencio commented:
"""
@jhrozek
Answer for 1)
I do believe it may work, but I would have to adapt `sssd --genconf` logic, in
order to avoid race-conditions. Shall I go for it?
I
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/32
Title: #32: Requesting a pull to SSSD:master from fidencio:wip/#3138
jhrozek commented:
"""
Hi, thank you for working on this. I think there are two "architectural"
questions we should answer.
1) Lukas raised the suggestion of using PreExec with `sssd
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/32
Title: #32: Requesting a pull to SSSD:master from fidencio:wip/#3138
fidencio commented:
"""
Okay, with the updated version of the patches both issues that I had are fixed.
Here is the link for the CI (that has passed):
