[SSSD] [sssd PR#529][comment] SPEC: Move secrets responder to the package sssd-kcm

2018-04-12 Thread fidencio 
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/529
Title: #529: SPEC: Move secrets responder to the package sssd-kcm

fidencio commented:
"""
Based on @jhrozek's comment and considering we may even deprecate the secrets 
responder soon, I'm closing this PR as "Rejected".

Nevertheless, thanks for the contribution!
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/529#issuecomment-380736941
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] [sssd PR#529][comment] SPEC: Move secrets responder to the package sssd-kcm

2018-03-12 Thread jhrozek 
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/529
Title: #529: SPEC: Move secrets responder to the package sssd-kcm

jhrozek commented:
"""
I understand the point about minimal dependencies of sssd-common, but I wonder 
if it was better to create a separate subpackage for the secrets binary. This 
is for two reasons, a) the proposed packaging is not intuitive, b) we are 
actually thinking about not talking to the secrets REST API from KCM to 
secrets, but writing to the secrets database directly. And then bundling the 
two responders together wouldn't make sense.
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/529#issuecomment-372444317
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org