[SSSD] [sssd PR#594][comment] KCM: be aware that size_t might have different size than other integers

URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/594 Title: #594: KCM: be aware that size_t might have different size than other integers jhrozek commented: """ * maste6191cf81d78cfff3140975734a7e1afbcd484f30r: """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/594#issuecomment-395765834

[SSSD] [sssd PR#594][comment] KCM: be aware that size_t might have different size than other integers

URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/594 Title: #594: KCM: be aware that size_t might have different size than other integers fidencio commented: """ CI: http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/90/16/summary.html Ack! """ See the full comment at

[SSSD] [sssd PR#594][comment] KCM: be aware that size_t might have different size than other integers

URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/594 Title: #594: KCM: be aware that size_t might have different size than other integers fidencio commented: """ @sumit-bose, I've tested the patch and it works as expected. I'm firing the CI for the sake of the process and I'll add the accepted label