[SSSD-users] Re: sssd-ldap using id_provider=files and auth_provider=ldap

Thank you for the explanation. I understand. > 2024/04/29 22:45、Sumit Bose のメール: > > Am Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 09:12:08PM +0900 schrieb koson...@me.com > : >> Hi, >> >> Thank you for your quick response. Yes, that was the reason. In this regard, >> let me allow to add the

[SSSD-users] Re: sssd-ldap using id_provider=files and auth_provider=ldap

Am Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 09:12:08PM +0900 schrieb koson...@me.com: > Hi, > > Thank you for your quick response. Yes, that was the reason. In this regard, > let me allow to add the following question. > > Is there any way to remove objectClass from the filter, such as to be > (uid=hogehoge) but

[SSSD-users] Re: sssd-ldap using id_provider=files and auth_provider=ldap

Hi, Thank you for your quick response. Yes, that was the reason. In this regard, let me allow to add the following question. Is there any way to remove objectClass from the filter, such as to be (uid=hogehoge) but not (&(uid=hogehoge)(objectclass=inetOrgPerson)) as in the failure case? Even

[SSSD-users] Re: sssd-ldap using id_provider=files and auth_provider=ldap

Am Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 03:25:49PM +0900 schrieb koson...@me.com: > Hi, > I am trying to authenticate a user on a server (Rocky Linux release 8.9) > using the combination of id_provider=files and auth_provider=ldap since our > organization's LDAP server does not have a posixAccount object class.