Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-06-04 Thread John Bossert
This suggests to me that, even in 6.4, udev is being started before sssd. If so, is this a bug? Can one of you submit it to the proper group? On (23/05/13 12:58), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:16:55PM +, John Bossert wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:59:28PM +, J

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-23 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:09:17PM +, John Bossert wrote: > Am fighting a battle with sssd/ldap and udev (RHEL6/Centos6). > > I have a udev rule that sets disk ownership to oracle/asmadmin at boot. The > user oracle and group asmadmin are registered in ldap. > > Other (udev) forums suggest

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-23 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (23/05/13 12:58), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:16:55PM +, John Bossert wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:59:28PM +, John Bossert wrote: >> >> >> /var/log/messages suggests that udev starts before sssd: >> >> >> >> >> >> May 17 16:54:07 seadv01-db01 kernel: ude

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-23 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:16:55PM +, John Bossert wrote: > >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:59:28PM +, John Bossert wrote: > > >> /var/log/messages suggests that udev starts before sssd: > > >> > > >> May 17 16:54:07 seadv01-db01 kernel: udev: starting version 147 > > >> May 17 16:54:09 s

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-22 Thread John Bossert
>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:59:28PM +, John Bossert wrote: >> /var/log/messages suggests that udev starts before sssd: >> >> May 17 16:54:07 seadv01-db01 kernel: udev: starting version 147 >> May 17 16:54:09 seadv01-db01 sssd: Starting up > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:01:53 -0700, Jakub

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-21 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:59:28PM +, John Bossert wrote: > /var/log/messages suggests that udev starts before sssd: > > May 17 16:54:07 seadv01-db01 kernel: udev: starting version 147 > May 17 16:54:09 seadv01-db01 sssd: Starting up I haven't found the bug Stephen was referring to (though I

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-20 Thread John Bossert
/var/log/messages suggests that udev starts before sssd: May 17 16:54:07 seadv01-db01 kernel: udev: starting version 147 May 17 16:54:09 seadv01-db01 sssd: Starting up On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:50:28PM +, John Bossert wrote: > Sorry for leaving out specifics. > > $ cat /etc/redhat-release >

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-20 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:50:28PM +, John Bossert wrote: > Sorry for leaving out specifics. > > $ cat /etc/redhat-release > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago) > > $ sssd -version > 1.8.0 > > The problem is that, during boot, udev is not correctly executing a rule to > s

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/20/2013 02:20 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > On 05/20/2013 02:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 05/20/2013 12:50 PM, John Bossert wrote: >>> Sorry for leaving out specifics. >> >> >> >>> $ cat /etc/redhat-release >> >>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-20 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 05/20/2013 02:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 05/20/2013 12:50 PM, John Bossert wrote: > > Sorry for leaving out specifics. > > > > > $ cat /etc/redhat-release > > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago) > > > > > $ sssd –version > > > 1.8.0 > > > > > The problem is that, d

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/20/2013 12:50 PM, John Bossert wrote: > Sorry for leaving out specifics. > > > > $ cat /etc/redhat-release > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago) > > > > $ sssd –version > > 1.8.0 > > > > The problem is that, during

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-20 Thread John Bossert
Sorry for leaving out specifics. $ cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago) $ sssd -version 1.8.0 The problem is that, during boot, udev is not correctly executing a rule to set user/group ownership, where the target user and group are maintained (exclusiv

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-20 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 09:41:52AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/20/2013 09:08 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:09:17PM +, John Bossert wrote: > >> Am fighting a battle with sssd/ldap and udev (RHEL6/Centos6).

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/20/2013 09:08 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:09:17PM +, John Bossert wrote: >> Am fighting a battle with sssd/ldap and udev (RHEL6/Centos6). >> >> I have a udev rule that sets disk ownership to oracle/asmadmin at >> boo

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-20 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:09:17PM +, John Bossert wrote: > Am fighting a battle with sssd/ldap and udev (RHEL6/Centos6). > > I have a udev rule that sets disk ownership to oracle/asmadmin at boot. The > user oracle and group asmadmin are registered in ldap. > > Other (udev) forums suggest

Re: [SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri 17 May 2013 05:09:17 PM EDT, John Bossert wrote: > Am fighting a battle with sssd/ldap and udev (RHEL6/Centos6). > > > > I have a udev rule that sets disk ownership to oracle/asmadmin at > boot. The user oracle and group asmadmin are regist

[SSSD-users] Problem with sssd and udev

2013-05-20 Thread John Bossert
Am fighting a battle with sssd/ldap and udev (RHEL6/Centos6). I have a udev rule that sets disk ownership to oracle/asmadmin at boot. The user oracle and group asmadmin are registered in ldap. Other (udev) forums suggest that udev is executing before networking is enabled, ergo ldap is unreach