[SSSD-users] Re: Recommended ldb version

2018-05-26 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (17/05/18 09:30), Galen Johnson wrote: >Just to circle back to this. He is seeing the same versions. I expect >this is something to take up with the Gentoo maintainers...or see if there >is a different overlay that is more current. > FYI: sssd does not require any new symbols/functions in ldb

[SSSD-users] Re: Recommended ldb version

2018-05-17 Thread Galen Johnson
Just to circle back to this. He is seeing the same versions. I expect this is something to take up with the Gentoo maintainers...or see if there is a different overlay that is more current. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:08 AM Galen Johnson wrote: > Unfortunately, that's not how the other distro's

[SSSD-users] Re: Recommended ldb version

2018-05-16 Thread Galen Johnson
Unfortunately, that's not how the other distro's do things. You might want to look at what Fedora includes since that would be close to the bleeding edge and, IIRC, SSSD is typically more current there. Gentoo has the "advantage" of compiling everything from scratch. As for compatibility issues,

[SSSD-users] Re: Recommended ldb version

2018-05-16 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
I use Gentoo and there I have a choice, up to 1.3.3. I want to use whatever everyone else uses to avoid problems. 1.2.2 should be fine then from what you just told me. What about 1.3.x ? Latest samba uses this so soon I guess we have to pull it in. Jocke On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 09:02 -0400, Galen J

[SSSD-users] Re: Recommended ldb version

2018-05-16 Thread Galen Johnson
The version may depend on your OS. For example, on RHEL/CentOS 7.5, it has 1.2.2. Is there any reason to believe that the version of ldb on your system is incompatible with your version of sssd? =G= On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:36 AM Joakim Tjernlund < joakim.tjernl...@infinera.com> wrote: > Whic