On 14.10.2016 19:42, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (14/10/16 12:19), Petr Spacek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just noticed that Github repo
>> https://github.com/SSSD/ding-libs/commits/master
>> is way out of date, with last commit from 2014.
>>
>> https:
?
Thanks!
--
Petr Spacek @ Red Hat
___
sssd-users mailing list -- sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:02 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:52:17AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:39:54AM +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>>
nce we
> already have a samba
> based interim solution).
>
> I haven't found a way to do that in sssd, is there?
> Maybe I am just full of it and this is really a bad idea?
Are you using FreeIPA? FreeIPA got support for "ID Views" which can be used
for this purpose. (I
On 22.8.2016 11:18, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 11:13 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 22.8.2016 10:49, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
>>>
>>> I do not think this is a good patch - systematically.
>>> Maybe better approach is to rather use gethostb
On 22.8.2016 10:49, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> I do not think this is a good patch - systematically.
> Maybe better approach is to rather use gethostbyname() than gethostname().
> My 2 cents.
Most importantly, this will work only for the simplest possible case where
host name of the client is sub-do
gured SSSD domain name in
>>>> sssd.conf ( [domain/domain.name] )
>>>
>>> There is already a simple workaround of using ad_hostname, I
>>> honestly don't think we need to be overly smart in sssd.
>>
>> It is not simple from an admin persp
ek
>
> Best,
> Longina
>
>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-
>> Fra: Petr Spacek [mailto:pspa...@redhat.com]
>> Sendt: 4. august 2016 11:08
>> Til: sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
>> Emne: [SSSD-users] Re: dyndns updates in sssd-13.4
>>
>> On
> It seems that adm-lnx438.adm.domain tries to make dyndns updates on secondary
> DNS and can't figure out about primary DNS.
>
> Best,
> Longina
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Petr Spacek [mailto:pspa...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: 27. juli 2016 16:11
&g
the target system (joined to domain A) and see its logs.
If you want to treat user1@domainA and user2@domainB as equal you might need
to tweak Kerberos mapping from principals to local users, see
https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-1.14/doc/admin/conf_files/krb5_conf.html#localauth-interface
and
oned in the wiki page, that will help us
to understand the problem.
Thank you!
--
Petr Spacek @ Red Hat
___
sssd-users mailing list
sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
