On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:06:23AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
xhci_free_tt_info() may access the invalid memory when it removes the
last entry but the list is not empty. Then tt_next reaches to the
list head but it still tries to check the tt_info of that entry.
This patch fixes the bug and
xhci_free_tt_info() may access the invalid memory when it removes the
last entry but the list is not empty. Then tt_next reaches to the
list head but it still tries to check the tt_info of that entry.
This patch fixes the bug and cleans up the messy code by rewriting
with a simple
Hello.
On 01-06-2012 12:06, Takashi Iwai wrote:
xhci_free_tt_info() may access the invalid memory when it removes the
last entry but the list is not empty. Then tt_next reaches to the
list head but it still tries to check the tt_info of that entry.
This patch fixes the bug and cleans up