Patch cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor() has been added to the 3.10-stable tree

2014-10-07 Thread gregkh
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor() to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is:

Re: Patch cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor() has been added to the 3.10-stable tree

2014-10-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:02:29PM -0700, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor() Sorry, I got confused in my earlier mail: it's this one that got reverted in mainline, the

Re: Patch cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor() has been added to the 3.10-stable tree

2014-10-07 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:34:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:02:29PM -0700, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor() Sorry, I got confused in

Re: Patch cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor() has been added to the 3.10-stable tree

2014-10-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:59:11PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: Kernel development is done in public, I hate private emails... Yeah, me too. I'm trying to encourage people not to do this unless they've got a really good reason (marketing departments tend to get really upset when you announce products