Peter Saint-Andre some time ago wrote:
On 7/16/13 4:27 AM, Carlo v. Loesch wrote:
Since XMPP isn't suitable for keeping meta-data private I would
presume that e2e privacy is out of scope for this mailing list,
really.
True.
Where would the topic e2e privacy for XMPP be in scope ?
IMHO, e2e security would probably make more sense as a XEP and working
group that has the time to zoom into all the implementation details.
S.
On 18 November 2013 10:30, Andreas Kuckartz a.kucka...@ping.de wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre some time ago wrote:
On 7/16/13 4:27 AM, Carlo v. Loesch
Hi,
On 18 Nov 2013, at 13:07, Andreas Kuckartz a.kucka...@ping.de wrote:
Simon Tennant:
IMHO, e2e security would probably make more sense as a XEP and working
group that has the time to zoom into all the implementation details.
Can that be solved by an XEP ?
What about this IETF draft?
On 18.11.2013 13:38, Steffen Larsen wrote:
Hi,
On 18 Nov 2013, at 13:07, Andreas Kuckartz a.kucka...@ping.de wrote:
Simon Tennant:
IMHO, e2e security would probably make more sense as a XEP and working
group that has the time to zoom into all the implementation details.
Can that be
It really depends what threats you are concerned about, Steffen.
I briefly looked at a Mumble project, which uses IM over Tor, when it
was mentioned on the IETF perpass list. Here were my thoughts:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/current/msg00215.html
Ciao
Hannes
Am
On 2013-11-18 13:07, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Simon Tennant:
IMHO, e2e security would probably make more sense as a XEP and working
group that has the time to zoom into all the implementation details.
Can that be solved by an XEP ?
What about this IETF draft? (I still have to read it)
Since I've kind of been summoned, some observations to several mails in a
single reply.
On 11/18/2013 10:30 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre some time ago wrote:
On 7/16/13 4:27 AM, Carlo v. Loesch wrote:
Since XMPP isn't suitable for keeping meta-data private I would
On 18 nov. 2013, at 23:49, Carlo v. Loesch c...@mail.symlynx.com wrote:
On 11/18/2013 01:53 PM, Florian Zeitz wrote:
On 18.11.2013 13:38, Steffen Larsen wrote:
Well you can alwaysâ run XMPP on top of TOR if you like that, if it is
the S2S routing that bothers you. :-)
Not so simple..
