On 21 July 2015 at 10:53, Peter Membrey pe...@membrey.hk wrote:
Hi guys,
Thanks for the encouragement and feedback!
I'm working on the ProtoXEP now and I think it's coming along quite
nicely. I hope to be able to submit it soon.
I could use some guidance on how to best approach describing
Hi guys,
Thanks for the encouragement and feedback!
I'm working on the ProtoXEP now and I think it's coming along quite nicely. I
hope to be able to submit it soon.
I could use some guidance on how to best approach describing this protocol. The
challenge is that I want to describe a transport
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Mobile Considerations
Abstract:
This document provides background information for XMPP
implementors
concerned with mobile devices operating on an LTE cellular
network.
URL:
I think this is a very high-quality submission, and there's no doubt in my
mind that we want this to be a XEP.
However, I expected this to be a (sorely-needed) major edit to XEP-0286,
which I wrote some years ago and has lagged behind the times. For the
record, I'm perfectly happy to completely
Hi,
the question of whether we need a new mobile XEP, or just update the old one
(potentially with entirely new text).
I'd be very interested in hearing any opinions on this one.
I'd prefer to have an updated version of XEP-0286, just to keep it simple.
Particularly because some parts of it
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Raft over XMPP
Abstract: This specification provides a means for transporting messages from
the Raft consensus algorithm over XMPP.
URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/raft.html
The XMPP Council will decide in the next
* Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net [2015-07-21 12:52]:
However, I expected this to be a (sorely-needed) major edit to XEP-0286,
which I wrote some years ago and has lagged behind the times. For the
record, I'm perfectly happy to completely hand over authorship of that
specification to Sam.
I
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Georg Lukas ge...@op-co.de wrote:
* Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net [2015-07-21 12:52]:
However, I expected this to be a (sorely-needed) major edit to XEP-0286,
which I wrote some years ago and has lagged behind the times. For the
record, I'm perfectly happy to
