Re: [Standards] XEP-0163: Personal Eventing Protocol - Clarification about the multi-items per node support

I mean, what's the difference between having max_items=0 and persist_items=false? On 09/01/2017 12:36, Sergey Dobrov wrote: Yeah, exactly, we hardly have a good description of the fields in the XEP-60? On 09/01/2017 12:26, Dave Cridland wrote: Loosely, I agree with Sergey, except I think he

Re: [Standards] XEP-0163: Personal Eventing Protocol - Clarification about the multi-items per node support

Yeah, exactly, we hardly have a good description of the fields in the XEP-60? On 09/01/2017 12:26, Dave Cridland wrote: Loosely, I agree with Sergey, except I think he means: Rather than: On 4 January 2017 at 22:52, Jaussoin Timothée wrote: Hi, After having a look

Re: [Standards] XEP-0163: Personal Eventing Protocol - Clarification about the multi-items per node support

Loosely, I agree with Sergey, except I think he means: Rather than: On 4 January 2017 at 22:52, Jaussoin Timothée wrote: > Hi, > > After having a look at XEP-0163: Personal Eventing Protocol and XEP-0060: > Publish-Subscribe I'd like to have a clarification regarding the

Re: [Standards] XEP-0384: OMEMO Encryption - Feedbacks and proposals

On 6 January 2017 at 08:36, Jaussoin Timothée wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently in the process of implementing end-to-end encryption in my > project. I naturally had a look at the freshly published XEP-0384: OMEMO > Encryption and I have some feedbacks to give on it. > > 1. Usage

Re: [Standards] XEP-0163: Personal Eventing Protocol - Clarification about the multi-items per node support

Hi, It seems to me that in case you have persist_items=1, it effectively means that the node can not store more than 1 item, i.e. the second item will replace the first one. In case it's zero node won't store any items at all and will only broadcast the events, you won't be able to retrieve