[Standards] xmpp namespaces registry lacks rosterver namespace

Hi, I've been trying to find a registration of the urn:xmpp:features:rosterver namespace and found it's only mentioned once(!) in RFC6121 and nowhere else - namely neither in https://xmpp.org/registrar/namespaces.html nor in https://xmpp.org/registrar/stream-features.html registry. Is it

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0186 (Invisible Command)

On 28.02.2017 17:27, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0186 (Invisible Command). Abstract: This document specifies an XMPP protocol extension for user invisibility. URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0186.html This Last Call

Re: [Standards] XSF Council Minutes: 28 February 2017

Thanks for doing these! Really appreciated. On 28 February 2017 at 16:37, JC Brand wrote: > XSF Council Minutes: 28 February 2017 > = > > Present: daniel, Tobias, Link Mauve, SamWhited, Dave Cridland > Minute taker: jcbrand > > 1). Clarify

[Standards] XSF Council Minutes: 28 February 2017

XSF Council Minutes: 28 February 2017 = Present: daniel, Tobias, Link Mauve, SamWhited, Dave Cridland Minute taker: jcbrand 1). Clarify CSI and Carbons state after SM resumption Tobias: Flow created PRs which clarify things and asked council to review. Would

[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0186 (Invisible Command)

This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0186 (Invisible Command). Abstract: This document specifies an XMPP protocol extension for user invisibility. URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0186.html This Last Call begins today and shall end at the close of business on

[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0381 (Internet of Things Special Interest Group (IoT SIG))

This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0381 (Internet of Things Special Interest Group (IoT SIG)). Abstract: This document proposes the formation of a Special Interest Group SIG) within the XSF devoted to the application of XMPP technologies to the Internet of