* Tobias Kräntzer [2017-01-30 23:51]:
> This also applies for other playloads send via a message stanza. If
> such a message does not contain a body element (or maybe an html
> element), it will not end up in the archive.
This is very similar to the struggles I'm having
I’ve not done the research I should have before responding to this, so
apologies if what I say is patently stupid.
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:36, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> On 15 March 2017 at 14:02, Steve Kille wrote:
>> What you are suggesting here is that
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Christian Schudt
wrote:
> The only difference I see is, that the document now explicitly mentions the
> base64 encoding, but I think it was clear enough before (due to samples).
> Is that worth a namespace bump? Are there any
Hi,
what exactly was the reason for a namespace bump for urn:xmpp:hashes:1 =>
urn:xmpp:hashes:2 ?
I couldn’t find any discussion about it in the Last Call [1], nor do I see any
real difference to the previous version 0.4 [2].
The only difference I see is, that the document now explicitly
On 15 March 2017 at 14:02, Steve Kille wrote:
> What you are suggesting here is that messages for "JID hidden" and "JID
> visible" channels are treated differently, and that you distribute real JIDs
> in JID visible channels.This was discussed and I was persuaded that
Dave,
> -Original Message-
> From: Standards [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Dave
> Cridland
> Sent: 15 March 2017 10:54
> To: XMPP Standards
> Subject: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden
>
> Folks,
>
> [This is long, sorry, and has a series of smaller
Folks,
[This is long, sorry, and has a series of smaller points near the
bottom, feel free to skip down]
As you may be aware, jid-hidden is a particular driver for our use of
MIX. So, too, is historical access to MIX messages, since we're
building an asynchronous message board type thing.
On 30 Jan 2017, at 22:52, Tobias Kräntzer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I searched the archive to see, if this has already been discussed recently,
> but didn’t finde anything. Please bear with me, if this has been already
> discussed too much.
>
> I’m recently implemented