Re: [Standards] XEP-0313: Storage Rules for Archives

2017-03-15 Thread Georg Lukas
* Tobias Kräntzer [2017-01-30 23:51]: > This also applies for other playloads send via a message stanza. If > such a message does not contain a body element (or maybe an html > element), it will not end up in the archive. This is very similar to the struggles I'm having

Re: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden

2017-03-15 Thread Kevin Smith
I’ve not done the research I should have before responding to this, so apologies if what I say is patently stupid. > On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:36, Dave Cridland wrote: >> On 15 March 2017 at 14:02, Steve Kille wrote: >> What you are suggesting here is that

Re: [Standards] urn:xmpp:hashes:2

2017-03-15 Thread Sam Whited
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Christian Schudt wrote: > The only difference I see is, that the document now explicitly mentions the > base64 encoding, but I think it was clear enough before (due to samples). > Is that worth a namespace bump? Are there any

[Standards] urn:xmpp:hashes:2

2017-03-15 Thread Christian Schudt
Hi, what exactly was the reason for a namespace bump for urn:xmpp:hashes:1 => urn:xmpp:hashes:2 ? I couldn’t find any discussion about it in the Last Call [1], nor do I see any real difference to the previous version 0.4 [2]. The only difference I see is, that the document now explicitly

Re: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden

2017-03-15 Thread Dave Cridland
On 15 March 2017 at 14:02, Steve Kille wrote: > What you are suggesting here is that messages for "JID hidden" and "JID > visible" channels are treated differently, and that you distribute real JIDs > in JID visible channels.This was discussed and I was persuaded that

Re: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden

2017-03-15 Thread Steve Kille
Dave, > -Original Message- > From: Standards [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Dave > Cridland > Sent: 15 March 2017 10:54 > To: XMPP Standards > Subject: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden > > Folks, > > [This is long, sorry, and has a series of smaller

[Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden

2017-03-15 Thread Dave Cridland
Folks, [This is long, sorry, and has a series of smaller points near the bottom, feel free to skip down] As you may be aware, jid-hidden is a particular driver for our use of MIX. So, too, is historical access to MIX messages, since we're building an asynchronous message board type thing.

Re: [Standards] XEP-0313: Storage Rules for Archives

2017-03-15 Thread Kevin Smith
On 30 Jan 2017, at 22:52, Tobias Kräntzer wrote: > > Hi, > > I searched the archive to see, if this has already been discussed recently, > but didn’t finde anything. Please bear with me, if this has been already > discussed too much. > > I’m recently implemented