Having the Compliance Suites in an XEP feels somewhat out of place to me - an
XEP listing other XEPs (I know many XEPs refer to others, but it's not the
same.)
Would it be better to run it as a separate set of documents - XMPP Compliance
Suites (XCS)? This would have the benefit of making them
http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2018-12-05/#16:00:08
1) Roll Call
Present: Jonas, Kev, Dave, Georg
Disparu: Link
3.1) AOB
Jonas suggests making use of the time while waiting for late-comers to discuss
an AOB point about the Compliance Suites, as he agreed to do the next
iteration. Jonas wonders
Am Fr., 7. Dez. 2018 um 17:36 Uhr schrieb Ralph Meijer :
>
> On 2018-12-07 10:27, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> > [..] However it would be nice to also figure out by looking at the JID if
> > that message might be a reflection or a message from ourself.
>
> Isn't this case covered by the inclusion of
On 2018-12-07 10:27, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
[..] However it would be nice to also figure out by looking at the JID if that
message might be a reflection or a message from ourself.
Isn't this case covered by the inclusion of the as per
example 30 (XEP-0369) and the prose just above it?
The
Hi,
so quoting from the MIX spec
> MIX messages are distributed by the channel with the from using the JID of
> the channel, with the Stable Participant ID of the sender in the resource.
> This enables a receiving system to distinguish messages based on sender using
> only the JID.
It is
