On 30.03.19 16:48, Jonas Schäfer (XSF Editor) wrote:
> Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0418 (DNS Queries over XMPP (DoX)) has been
> released.
>
> Abstract:
> This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension for sending DNS
> queries and getting DNS responses over XML streams. Each DNS query-
>
On 30.03.19 16:48, Jonas Schäfer (XSF Editor) wrote:
> Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0417 (E2E Authentication in XMPP: Certificate
> Issuance and Revocation) has been released.
>
> Abstract:
> This specification defines a way for a certificate authority to serve
> certificate signing requests via XMPP in
Version 1.0.0 of XEP-0419 (Improving Baseline Security in XMPP) has
been released.
Abstract:
This document describes a number of concrete and effective mechanisms
for offering significant security enhancements to XMPP, with broad
applicability.
Changelog:
Acceptance as XEP-0419 (XEP Editor
On 01.04.19 11:24, Evgeny wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 11:13 AM, Paul Schaub wrote:
>> There was a ton of
>> interesting discussions around OMEMO and other stuff, as well as some
>> productive coding (and Mate!).
>
> Not to bash the ProtoXEP itself, but why the community constantly
>
On 21 Mar 2019, at 17:22, Tedd Sterr wrote:
> 3b) Last Call: XEP-0353 (Jingle Message Initiation) -
> https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0353.html
> Link notes that there were comments on this from RalphM's previous team, and
> Андрей's team too; Dave additionally notes Fippo's contacts.
> Dave is
On 31 Mar 2019, at 00:19, Tedd Sterr wrote:
>
> http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2019-03-27?p=h#2019-03-27-237ca0091c8adb57
>
> Dave is having a catastrophic day, so would be grateful for skipping the
> meeting this week.
> Jonas and Georg would like to at least get the vote started on the
RFC 4648 [1] defines two encodings for base 64:
§ 4. Base 64 Encoding: the familiar [A-Za-z0-9+/]; and
§ 5. Base 64 Encoding with URL and Filename Safe Alphabet: [A-Za-z0-9-_]
For the latter it says:
> This encoding may be referred to as "base64url". This encoding
> should not be regarded as
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, at 15:51, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
> Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0418 (DNS Queries over XMPP (DoX)) has been
> released.
The DNS request and response are encoded like so:
> The body MUST be encoded with base64 RFC 4648 [5]. Padding characters
> for base64 MUST NOT be included.
But
Hi,
> Within the IEEE IoT Harmonization effort, there is a mechanism to
E2E-encrypt stanzas in XMPP:
> https://gitlab.com/IEEE-SA/XMPPI/IoT/blob/master/E2E.md
This seems targeted specifically to IoT which seem to have different needs
Just two points from this document that i see completely
Why is the IEEE working on this? Surely it would be considerably more
productive just to ask the XSF (or even the IETF, I can see arguments for
both) about the problem?
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 10:51, Peter Waher wrote:
> Hello Paul, and those in the community interested in end-to-end encryption
>
Hello Paul, and those in the community interested in end-to-end encryption of
stanzas.
Within the IEEE IoT Harmonization effort, there is a mechanism to E2E-encrypt
stanzas in XMPP:
https://gitlab.com/IEEE-SA/XMPPI/IoT/blob/master/E2E.md
Site for the IEEE IoT Harmonization project:
Am Mo., 1. Apr. 2019 um 09:26 Uhr schrieb Evgeny :
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 11:13 AM, Paul Schaub
> wrote:
> > There was a ton of
> > interesting discussions around OMEMO and other stuff, as well as some
> > productive coding (and Mate!).
>
> Not to bash the ProtoXEP itself, but why the
Hi!
Well, MLS is not even a thing yet. The slrint made it very clear, that OMEMO is
a thing which people actually use. Of the 20 people that participated in the
sprint, at least 15 were working on OMEMO related projects.
The ProtoXEP is intended to be used with any encryption algorithm and that
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 11:13 AM, Paul Schaub
wrote:
There was a ton of
interesting discussions around OMEMO and other stuff, as well as some
productive coding (and Mate!).
Not to bash the ProtoXEP itself, but why the community constantly
discussing OMEMO (and sometimes PGP), when there is
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:03 PM, Tedd Sterr
wrote:
somewhat working MIX implementation!
Apr 1 :/
___
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
Your cat has skills!
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 11:04, Tedd Sterr wrote:
> I wasn't at the Berlin sprint, so I held my own mini-sprint - at home,
> pair-programming with my cat - which mainly involved me coding and her not
> paying any attention. After an extended weekend, too much caffeine, and
>
I wasn't at the Berlin sprint, so I held my own mini-sprint - at home,
pair-programming with my cat - which mainly involved me coding and her not
paying any attention. After an extended weekend, too much caffeine, and meals
consisting mainly of unhealthy snacks, I present to you a somewhat
Hi everyone!
The Sprint in Berlin was great and it was huge fun meeting so many
developers (and users as well!) in person. There was a ton of
interesting discussions around OMEMO and other stuff, as well as some
productive coding (and Mate!).
I took the opportunity to once again start a
18 matches
Mail list logo
