On Freitag, 19. Juli 2019 19:42:22 CEST Marvin W wrote:
> > 2. Backward compatibility
> >
> > This XEP does not provide any way for legacy clients to see reactions.
> > This (silently) precludes a large number of users from a subset of the
> > discussion. I propose(d) the following addition:
>
>
B
Am Montag, 22. Juli 2019, 15:38:00 CEST schrieb Tedd Sterr:
> There appears to be a lack of interest, which is fair enough, but just to
> check opinion…
>
> Reply with a choice from one of the below; or don't - I'm not your boss.
>
> A. I'm not interested, leave me alone.
> B. I'd probably us
Indeed, the poll is on members@, and we have 17 responses so far.
I'll bring that to the board meeting on Thursday.
ᐧ
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 5:43 PM Dave Cridland wrote:
> B, E, F.
>
> Also G - the poll was on members@ rather than here, and it might actually
> be interesting to poll the wider
B, E, F.
Also G - the poll was on members@ rather than here, and it might actually
be interesting to poll the wider standards community and/or jdev. Maybe.
___
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: s
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019, at 15:38, Tedd Sterr wrote:
> There appears to be a lack of interest, which is fair enough, but just
> to check opinion…
>
> Reply with a choice from one of the below; or don't - I'm not your boss.
>
> A. I'm not interested, leave me alone.
> B. I'd probably use a badge i
There appears to be a lack of interest, which is fair enough, but just to check
opinion…
Reply with a choice from one of the below; or don't - I'm not your boss.
A. I'm not interested, leave me alone.
B. I'd probably use a badge if there were an official one, but I don't really
care which.
C. I