Just a few things I noticed while reading this proto xep:
In the introduction it describes "a server adding information on a link
previously posted to a chat room" as a use case of Fastening, which is
exactly a use cases of XEP-0367 (Message Attaching) as already pointed
to by Sam. Is it expected
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, at 10:08, Kevin Smith wrote:
> I’ve instead submitted a fastening protoXEP that Reactions can use to
> allay my concerns. If that is published, I’m amenable to accepting
> reactions as-is and immediately updating it to use fastening
> (providing we agreed that me doing so was a
On 29 Aug 2019, at 10:05, Dave Cridland wrote:
> Can I persuade you to work on this on the road to Draft, rather than leaving
> a ProtoXEP addressing a problem I think we all want to solve languishing in
> limbo?
I’ve instead submitted a fastening protoXEP that Reactions can use to allay my
co
* Andrew Nenakhov [2019-09-05 09:45]:
> [..] So we have to
> operate fully without presence, thus, if a caller rejects a message at
> the exact moment we fetch an archive, we won't receive
> message in normal XMPP way.
You can enable Carbons to receive live messages. If you do so before
fetching
