On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:08:49PM +0200, Georg Lukas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> error type stanzas are currently ephemeral, and not taken seriously by
> many (client) developers. As one step in increasing the (perceived)
> reliability of XMPP messaging, I'd like to make message errors
> persistent, so
> -Original Message-
> From: Standards On Behalf Of Daniel Gultsch
> Sent: 17 June 2019 17:21
> To: XMPP Standards
> Subject: [Standards] MIX: Roster entries -> private PEP node (or something)
>
> Hi,
>
> at the last summit we sort of came to the conclusion that we want to get rid
>
Jonas has clarified that the id/jid issue is not present between current
version of 405 and 369.
There is a version issue. I propose to update 405 to reference core:1 and to
use pam:2 (so there is no confusion caused by current 405).
I don't think that duplicating 369 spec in 405 is a
Addendum.
2019-09-11 (expiring 2019-08-25)
Proposed XMPP Extension: Message Fastening -
https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/fasten.html
Dave: +1 (just to get progress)
Georg: +1 (let's make some progress)
Jonas: +1 (we can develop this further in Experimental)
Kev: +0
Link: +1 (don't mind a new
2019-08-07 (expired 2019-08-21)
FAILED (-0:4:+1) PR #806 - XEP-0060: Add pubsub#public in Publish-Subscribe
features - https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/806
VETOED (-1:3:+1) PR #808 - XEP-0045: Add Tags configuration and metadata -
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/808
PASSED (-0:1:+4) PR #805 -
On Dienstag, 17. September 2019 18:07:28 CEST Steve Kille wrote:
> Jonas,
>
> I'm thinking about this.
>
> You note: "2. XEP-0369 uses the @id attribute and the @jid attribute on
> ."
>
> I can only see use of can you point out where @id is used?
Sorry, that wasn’t clear. I was referring
http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2019-09-11?p=h#2019-09-11-8afc1ce1dd4dff71
1) Roll Call
Present: Jonas, Link, Dave, Kev, Georg
2) Agenda Bashing
Dave didn't notice it was Wednesday and is sorry.
Kev nonchalantly mentions Fastening; Dave sees one announced proto-XEP and two
PRs.
3a) Proposed XMPP
