On 10/24/19 9:40 PM, Kim Alvefur wrote:
We should refrain from using things like grapheme clusters in wire formats,
as those are subject to changes in upcoming Unicode versions and thus the
wire format would be understood differently depending on the Unicode version
implemented by the client.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 08:32:04PM +0200, Marvin W wrote:
> Thus, I would vote for using codepoints.
I agree.
> The rule should just be that clients should not do that on outgoing
> data.
I agree with this as well.
> We should refrain from using things like grapheme clusters in wire formats,
>
On 10/21/19 4:06 PM, Jonathan Lennox wrote:
The right concept here is probably "grapheme clusters", as defined in
Unicode Standard Annex 29. ICU has support for this.
We should refrain from using things like grapheme clusters in wire
formats, as those are subject to changes in upcoming
пн, 21 окт. 2019 г. в 19:08, Jonathan Lennox :
> The right concept here is probably "grapheme clusters", as defined in
> Unicode Standard Annex 29. ICU has support for this.
>
We have succeded implementing reference processing on three clients and on
the server side. And not one of the
