On 03.02.20 18:34, Dave Cridland wrote:
> Very quick note: I've picked up an entertaining virus while at FOSDEM -
> hopefully not *that* coronavirus - so I'm not thinking clear enough to
> respond to the comments here but I am reading them.
>
> At the moment, I don't think there's anything I find
On 29.01.20 15:21, Jonas Schäfer (XSF Editor) wrote:
> Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0430 (Inbox) has been released.
>
> Abstract:
> This specification proposes a mechanism by which clients can find a
> list of ongoing conversations and their state.
>
> Changelog:
> Accepted by vote of Council on
Very quick note: I've picked up an entertaining virus while at FOSDEM -
hopefully not *that* coronavirus - so I'm not thinking clear enough to
respond to the comments here but I am reading them.
At the moment, I don't think there's anything I find myself moved to argue
against; Maxime's point
On 2020/02/03, Maxime Buquet wrote:
> > 3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not,
> > why not?
>
> I have not implemented it yet, but I would.
>
> As this spec allows to handle bookmarks separately, it's easier to
> handle group/Enterprise(tm) bookmarks. The server can
My answer is a mix of what Sam, Daniel, and lovetox say. :)
> This Last Call begins today and shall end at the close of business on
> 2020-02-12.
> Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and send
> your feedback to the standards@xmpp.org discussion list:
> 1. Is this
Hi all,
So, first off, I was wrong. The summary is that the Signal Protocol (and
the IV values, in particular) is most likely not to be encumbered. While
it's not 100% clear, the balance of evidence is that a non-GPL
implementation that is fully compatible could be written.
A number of people
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 22:46, Tedd Sterr wrote:
> http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2020-01-29?p=h#2020-01-29-3fa75007a3268995
>
> *1) Roll Call*
> Present: Daniel, Zash, Jonas, Georg, Dave
>
> *2) Agenda Bashing*
> Jonas admits to having forgotten about the request for XEPs to LC/CFE -
> maybe one
