Yes I think it should just be ignored, but I guess this is another example of how fastenings were created with a different usecase in mind and aren't necessary or relevant to retractions.
I'll try to update the XEP soon to remove them. On June 10, 2022 5:00:18 PM GMT+02:00, Goffi <go...@goffi.org> wrote: >Hi, > >I'm implemeting XEP-0424 (Message Retraction) and I'm wondering how I'm >supposed to act when I receive a fastening removal (as in >https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0422.html#remove) on a retracted message? >Am I supposed to restore the message (meaning that I would somehow archive >it), or to ignore the removal request? >I guess the latter would make more sense (it's simpler to send a new identical >message than to keep an archive of supposedly removed message), but it would >make sense to indicate that in business rules. >Also should I notice the sender/receiver when a removal is rejected? > >As a side note, the XEP is still flagged as "last call" but the call has been >vetoed, thus the XEP should be updated accordingly. > >Thanks >Goffi > > >_______________________________________________ >Standards mailing list >Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards >Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org >_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
