[Standards] [XEP-0407] - Message retraction question

Hi, While I was rereading XEP-0407 I discovered that it specifies custom element within urn:xmpp:mix:misc:0 namespace. I'm now wondering why it uses this custom solution instead of using element with namespace urn:xmpp:message-retract:0 as specified in XEP-0424. I suppose that XEP-0407 was c

Re: [Standards] [XEP-406] Questions

> I have another question, maybe you know how to implement it. When I send a > change for the allowed node, what's the notification the other members > subscribed to that node receive: the complete list for allowed items or only > the elements I sent to be published/retracted? If I recall corr

Re: [Standards] [XEP-406] Questions

Hi, > I'm doing an implementation of the MIX (XEP-0369) and now, I was implementing > some administrative tasks, like config and info modification, but I was > questioning about some parts, because, i.e. Example 7 in XEP-0406 (MIX-ADMIN) > is saying: > > > > > > I mean, it's

Re: [Standards] MUC Mention Notifications

> Wiadomość napisana przez JC Brand w dniu 30.12.2020, o > godz. 17:28: > >> In the proposed protoXEP element contains real bare JID of the >> user affiliated with the room, which is available, if I'm correct, only in >> non-anonymous rooms. In semi-anonymous it may not be available. Due to

Re: [Standards] MUC Mention Notifications

Hi all, > To enable this feature, I've opted for a configuration setting in the MUC. > > Apparently Tigase already has a similar feature to this protoXEP and relies > on letting the user opt-in when registering a nickname with the MUC. > > Maybe someone from Tigase can comment on the particular

Re: [Standards] XEP-0427: MAM Fastening Collation questions

> I've started the implementation of XEP-0427 with a goal to use the collation > of fastenings (and pseudo-fastenings) to reduce traffic related to MAM > history synchronization. > > > You're ahead of me; though the Mobile Lead at Pando is begging me to do the > same. > > I should warn that

[Standards] XEP-0427: MAM Fastening Collation questions

Hi everyone, I'm sorry but this will be a long email. I've started the implementation of XEP-0427 with a goal to use the collation of fastenings (and pseudo-fastenings) to reduce traffic related to MAM history synchronization. I was thinking about using `collate` summarizing to retrieve delive

Re: [Standards] Feedback: XEP-0353: Jingle Message Initiation

Hi, > Wiadomość napisana przez Daniel Gultsch w dniu > 08.04.2020, o godz. 12:15: > > Add a disco feature: > Assuming that I have presence subscription with the person I want to > call and I can see that they support Jingle I still might want to use > JMI to have all of their devices ring. Howe

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0357 (Push Notifications)

>> At the Summit, I've suggested to send all required data within Push >> notification, >> but for security reasons, encrypted by XMPP server initiating push >> notification. >> Here is a document which describes encryption process done by us at Tigase >> https://tigase.github.io/tigase-xeps/doc

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0357 (Push Notifications)

> Wiadomość napisana przez Florian Schmaus w dniu > 07.04.2020, o godz. 09:45: > > On 4/7/20 8:17 AM, Daniel Gultsch wrote: >> Am Di., 31. März 2020 um 20:42 Uhr schrieb Jonas Schäfer >> : >>> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on >>> XEP-0357. >>> >>> Title: Push No

Re: [Standards] MIX Join: JID or ID?

Hi, > Wiadomość napisana przez Paul Schaub w dniu > 28.02.2020, o godz. 14:01: > > Hi List! > > XEP-0369 (MIX-Core) section 7.1.2 about joining a channel states that > when the users server sends a join request to the mix channel, the > channel responds with an IQ of type result. Further it st