Re: [Standards] Small animated video about the "Fediverse" (XMPP inside)

2022-04-28 Thread Sonny Piers
Thanks Jehan! The video is very comprehensive and entertaining - well done. I hope we meet again soon. On jeu., avril 28 2022 at 22:55:12 +0200, Jehan Pagès wrote: Hello XMPP lovers and makers! Long time no see, since some people might or not remember me from about 10 years ago (or more), w

Re: [Standards] XEP-0156 _xmppconnect is vulnerable to MITM

2022-02-13 Thread Sonny Piers
Thanks you Travis for taking the time to make individual reports for each implementations. I fixed it in xmpp.js 0.13.1 . If that works for everybody - I'm happy to remove BOSH / and XEP-0156 from XMPP Compliance Suites 2022. If someone disagree please come up with a different solution than

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0459 (XMPP Compliance Suites 2022)

2021-10-27 Thread Sonny Piers
nce suite - I agree it could be better but it's a large topic for which I don't see myself in capacity to do this at the moment. Cheers -- Sonny Piers so...@fastmail.net On Tue, Sep 7, 2021, at 15:59, Jonas Schäfer wrote: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Implicit XMPP WebSocket Endpoints

2021-02-03 Thread Sonny Piers
ere was no interest for it. Perhaps bosh "recommended" endpoints should be added as well. -- Sonny Piers so...@fastmail.net On Wed, Feb 3, 2021, at 18:43, Sam Whited wrote: > In that case, why have an XEP at all? If you're doing anything like > this you don't need th

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Implicit XMPP WebSocket Endpoints

2021-02-03 Thread Sonny Piers
. As a follow up: Client and client libraries are free to choose to fallback to these endpoints if the service is not a FQDN. Regardless of this proposal, 0156 should become mandatory for compliance suite web core. WDYT? -- Sonny Piers so...@fastmail.net On Wed, Feb 3, 2021, at

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Implicit XMPP WebSocket Endpoints

2021-02-03 Thread Sonny Piers
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021, at 14:20, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 2/3/21 1:47 PM, Sonny Piers wrote> Do you think it makes sense to add > a note in the XEP to encourage > > vendors to change and/or add the endpoints as default configuration? > > An encouraging note sounds fine.

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Implicit XMPP WebSocket Endpoints

2021-02-03 Thread Sonny Piers
xt compliance suite. The equivalent for TCP (srv records) is in core so why not its equivalent for web ? Getting srv records relevant for HTTP was impossible and IIRC painful for XMPP deployments, I would like to avoid going through the same situation for XMPP WebSocket. Cheers -- Sonny Pie

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: DOAP usage in XMPP

2021-01-14 Thread Sonny Piers
ple enough that I don't need to understand how it works to edit an example or template. Regarding its usage in the wild, there is also every official and non-official application under the GNOME project. Cheers -- Sonny Piers so...@fastmail.net On Thu, Jan 14, 2021, at 17:52, Peter Sa