Re: [Standards] [editor] XEP-0082 errounously states that CCYY has four digits

2015-07-02 Thread Peter Saint-Andre - yet
[ moving to standards@xmpp.org ] On 4/20/15 7:08 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: Dear authors for XEP-0082: XMPP Date and Time Profiles, please consider the attached patch to clarify that the 'CCYY' part may consists of more then four digits and may be prefixed with a minus sign, as specified by

Re: [Standards] [editor] XEP-0082 errounously states that CCYY has four digits

2015-07-02 Thread Dave Cridland
On 2 July 2015 at 18:42, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote: As to years with more than 4 digits, those would be needed starting in the year 1. Although I see no harm in mentioning the possibility of that, I doubt that XMPP will still be in use 7985 years from now. ;-)

Re: [Standards] [editor] XEP-0082 errounously states that CCYY has four digits

2015-07-02 Thread Peter Saint-Andre - yet
On 7/2/15 1:10 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: On 2 July 2015 at 18:42, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net mailto:pe...@andyet.net wrote: As to years with more than 4 digits, those would be needed starting in the year 1. Although I see no harm in mentioning the possibility of

Re: [Standards] [editor] XEP-0082 errounously states that CCYY has four digits

2015-04-22 Thread Matthew A. Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 4/20/15 7:08 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: Dear authors for XEP-0082: XMPP Date and Time Profiles, please consider the attached patch to clarify that the 'CCYY' part may consists of more then four digits and may be prefixed with a minus