Re: [Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

2018-06-05 Thread Kevin Smith
On 4 Jun 2018, at 16:28, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > On 04.06.2018 16:43, Jonas Wielicki wrote: >> A random side note: I found another argument against the variant where the >> client resource is encoded together with the participant id in the resource: >> The client resource is -- in contrast

Re: [Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

2018-06-05 Thread Kevin Smith
On 4 Jun 2018, at 16:03, Dave Cridland wrote: > On 4 June 2018 at 14:37, Kevin Smith wrote: >> On 4 Jun 2018, at 12:15, Dave Cridland wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille wrote: >> >> >> >> To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and

Re: [Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

2018-06-04 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 04.06.2018 16:43, Jonas Wielicki wrote: > A random side note: I found another argument against the variant where the > client resource is encoded together with the participant id in the resource: > The client resource is -- in contrast to the channel name and participant id > -- not under

Re: [Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

2018-06-04 Thread Dave Cridland
On 4 June 2018 at 15:43, Jonas Wielicki wrote: > I think this is a good point, and I’ve run into this quite a few times > when > implementing MUC. Branching on the message type where 'groupchat' is > somehow > special, but then again only if it does *not* come from the bare JID, and > if > it

Re: [Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

2018-06-04 Thread Dave Cridland
On 4 June 2018 at 14:37, Kevin Smith wrote: > On 4 Jun 2018, at 12:15, Dave Cridland wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille wrote: > >> > >> To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and routing > >> scheme. > >> > >> I am proposing that this uses a

Re: [Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

2018-06-04 Thread Jonas Wielicki
On Montag, 4. Juni 2018 15:37:00 CEST Kevin Smith wrote: > On 4 Jun 2018, at 12:15, Dave Cridland wrote: > >> On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille wrote: > >> > >> To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and routing > >> scheme. > >> > >> I am proposing that this uses a

Re: [Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

2018-06-04 Thread Kevin Smith
On 4 Jun 2018, at 12:15, Dave Cridland wrote: >> >> >> >> On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille wrote: >> >> To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and routing >> scheme. >> >> I am proposing that this uses a different scheme to messages from the >> channel (this is

Re: [Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

2018-06-04 Thread Steve Kille
From: Standards On Behalf Of Dave Cridland Sent: 04 June 2018 12:15 To: XMPP Standards Subject: Re: [Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille mailto:steve.ki...@isode.com> > wrote: To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addr

Re: [Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

2018-06-04 Thread Dave Cridland
On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille wrote: > > To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and routing > scheme. > > I am proposing that this uses a different scheme to messages from the > channel (this is Kev's variant 4). > > The rationale for having a different scheme is

[Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

2018-06-04 Thread Steve Kille
To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and routing scheme. I am proposing that this uses a different scheme to messages from the channel (this is Kev's variant 4). The rationale for having a different scheme is that you want to be able to distinguish from a stanza that