On 4 Jun 2018, at 16:28, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>
> On 04.06.2018 16:43, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
>> A random side note: I found another argument against the variant where the
>> client resource is encoded together with the participant id in the resource:
>> The client resource is -- in contrast
On 4 Jun 2018, at 16:03, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 4 June 2018 at 14:37, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> On 4 Jun 2018, at 12:15, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille wrote:
>> >>
>> >> To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and
On 04.06.2018 16:43, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> A random side note: I found another argument against the variant where the
> client resource is encoded together with the participant id in the resource:
> The client resource is -- in contrast to the channel name and participant id
> -- not under
On 4 June 2018 at 15:43, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> I think this is a good point, and I’ve run into this quite a few times
> when
> implementing MUC. Branching on the message type where 'groupchat' is
> somehow
> special, but then again only if it does *not* come from the bare JID, and
> if
> it
On 4 June 2018 at 14:37, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 4 Jun 2018, at 12:15, Dave Cridland wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille wrote:
> >>
> >> To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and routing
> >> scheme.
> >>
> >> I am proposing that this uses a
On Montag, 4. Juni 2018 15:37:00 CEST Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 4 Jun 2018, at 12:15, Dave Cridland wrote:
> >> On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille wrote:
> >>
> >> To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and routing
> >> scheme.
> >>
> >> I am proposing that this uses a
On 4 Jun 2018, at 12:15, Dave Cridland wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille wrote:
>>
>> To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and routing
>> scheme.
>>
>> I am proposing that this uses a different scheme to messages from the
>> channel (this is
From: Standards On Behalf Of Dave Cridland
Sent: 04 June 2018 12:15
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE
On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille mailto:steve.ki...@isode.com> > wrote:
To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addr
On 4 June 2018 at 11:37, Steve Kille wrote:
>
> To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and routing
> scheme.
>
> I am proposing that this uses a different scheme to messages from the
> channel (this is Kev's variant 4).
>
> The rationale for having a different scheme is
To support IQs in MIX-CORE, there needs to be an addressing and routing
scheme.
I am proposing that this uses a different scheme to messages from the
channel (this is Kev's variant 4).
The rationale for having a different scheme is that you want to be able to
distinguish from a stanza that
10 matches
Mail list logo