Re: [Standards] MIX Proxy Jids are People Too

On 24 May 2018 at 17:31, Kevin Smith wrote: > On 24 May 2018, at 16:52, Dave Cridland wrote: > > > > So the crux of my discussions about MIX proxy jids and stanza types with > Steve is that, as much as possible, messages should be carried in message >

Re: [Standards] MIX Proxy Jids are People Too

On 24 May 2018, at 16:52, Dave Cridland wrote: > > So the crux of my discussions about MIX proxy jids and stanza types with > Steve is that, as much as possible, messages should be carried in message > stanzas that behave normally, and presence should be carried in presence

[Standards] MIX Proxy Jids are People Too

So the crux of my discussions about MIX proxy jids and stanza types with Steve is that, as much as possible, messages should be carried in message stanzas that behave normally, and presence should be carried in presence stanzas that also may be treated as much as possible like any other presence