On 06-02-17 15:53, Marvin Gülker wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:25:15PM +0300, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
I guess that's your opinion? Or where is it stated in the RFC? is a mandatory-to-negotiate
feature (at least if included), thus, clients MUST NOT ignore it.
I tend to agree with this.
> On 6 Feb 2017, at 14:53, Marvin Gülker wrote:
> Someone creating a new XMPP client naturally starts by
> implementing RFC 6120, only to discover that it is obsoleted by
> practice.
But they would still interoperate, because 6120 is the baseline. Bind2 is not
the
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:25:15PM +0300, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> I guess that's your opinion? Or where is it stated in the RFC? xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-bind'/> is a mandatory-to-negotiate
> feature (at least if included), thus, clients MUST NOT ignore it.
I tend to agree with this.